Re: [Bloat] curious.....

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:38:41 -0500
Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 20:02 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> > About prioritizing, I am less optimistic as I can not see how the system can behave well under extreme load; I for one would be quite unhappy if an device on my internal network could effectively DOS my ability to make phone calls (I switched to IP telephony so this theoretical issue has become practical for me).
> > 	Or put it that way, I hope that the core internet is over-provided and will not cause congestion, at the same time I want to be able to max out my internet connection and still be able to phone.
> 
> Making it impossible for an internal host to DOS VoIP quality is one of
> the reasons I've been playing with per host fairness in addition to
> three priority levels (per host). The tc script is below with a link to
> performance results.
> 
> http://git.coverfire.com/?p=linux-qos-scripts.git;a=blob;f=src-3tos.sh;hb=HEAD
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Looks like wonder shaper. It is a fine idea if you know the number of hosts and flows
and traffic and upstream bandwidth. But if you don't then it gets to be a mess.