From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D3421F228 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C69C406062; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:14:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Spacefalcon) From: Hal Murray In-Reply-To: Message from msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Spacefalcon) of "Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:26:55 GMT." <1404292326.AA29710@ivan.Harhan.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:14:32 -0700 Message-Id: <20140430001432.6C69C406062@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> Cc: hmurray@megapathdsl.net, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] the side effects of 330ms lag in the real world X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:14:33 -0000 > 256? Really? Which ISP/CLEC is that? I thought there were no SDSL > providers left besides Covad/Megapath, and the latter has Nokia (former > Diamond Lane) D50 DSLAMs, whose SDSL speed options are 192, 384, 768, 1152 > and 1536 kbps - no 256 in that list. Thanks for the heads-up. I wonder when my brain warped the numbers? Yes, I'm running at 384. I remember that many years ago I had something slightly faster. Maybe 416? (384+32) I think that went away when Covad got in financial trouble and Megapath had to switch to somebody else. In addition to your list, my modem's list also includes 2320. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.