From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B349721F236 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 01:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1tbd-0007UW-Ib for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:40:01 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1tbd-0007ib-7V for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:40:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:40:01 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20140701084001.GA27192@sesse.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.14.5-itk01 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Bloat] viability of the data center in the internet of the future X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 08:40:06 -0000 On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:37:23AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > I > liked web proxies, they were often capable of reducing traffic by 10s > of percentage points, reduce latency enormously for lossy or satellite > links, and were frequently used by large organizations (like schools) > to manage content. By “manage” I assume you mean “censor”, right? (I find it questionable that we are teaching our children from the very beginning of their education that it is OK to censor the Internet arbitrarily.) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/