From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126C421F1F0 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 02:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1uLV-0004SK-65 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:27:25 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1uLU-00047f-Tn for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:27:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 11:27:24 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20140701092724.GB27192@sesse.net> References: <20140701084001.GA27192@sesse.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.14.5-itk01 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Bloat] viability of the data center in the internet of the future X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:27:29 -0000 On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > Have you done a google search with "safesearch" off lately? Try it for > a day. At work. I checked. It's off. I've never changed the default. So the answer is: Sure, I do that all the time. > Places like, um, New Zealand. Having actually visited New Zealand a year or so ago, I'm pretty sure what they need for proper Internet would not be filtering proxies, but more fiber. :-) >> (I find it questionable that we are teaching our children from the very >> beginning of their education that it is OK to censor the Internet arbitrarily.) > Got any kids? No. But I also don't accept “think about the children” as a blanket excuse, just as I don't accept “to protect against terrorism” or “stability of the state” as blanket excuse. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/