From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] sigcomm wifi
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:57:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140821195735.GA1719@sesse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408211241360.19968@nftneq.ynat.uz>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:49:02PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> One trick we pulled this year at Scale that I think made a big
> difference is that we labled the 2.4 GHz network "Scale-slow" and
> the 5GHz network "Scale", this seems to have pushed a LOT more
> people to using the less congested 5GHz band.
I'll stop preaching the Cisco gospel soon (well, e.g. Aruba would probably
also do just the same thing :-) ), but in a WLC-based solution, there's a
setting to just refuse the first few associations on 2.4 GHz if it detects
the client is 5 GHz capable. It's a hack, but it pushes people over to 5 GHz
quite effectively.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 16:45 Dave Taht
2014-08-20 7:12 ` Eggert, Lars
2014-08-20 14:01 ` Dave Taht
2014-08-20 22:05 ` Jim Gettys
2014-08-21 6:52 ` Eggert, Lars
2014-08-21 7:11 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-21 8:30 ` David Lang
2014-08-22 23:07 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-22 23:50 ` David Lang
2014-08-23 19:26 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-23 23:29 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-23 23:40 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-23 23:49 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-24 1:33 ` David Lang
2014-08-24 2:29 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-24 5:12 ` David Lang
2014-08-24 6:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-24 8:24 ` David Lang
2014-08-24 9:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-25 7:25 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-30 7:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-31 20:46 ` Simon Barber
2014-08-25 7:35 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-24 1:09 ` David Lang
2014-08-25 8:01 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-25 8:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-08-25 8:33 ` Michael Welzl
2014-08-25 9:18 ` Alex Burr
2014-08-31 22:37 ` David Lang
2014-08-31 23:09 ` Simon Barber
2014-09-01 0:25 ` David Lang
2014-09-01 2:14 ` Simon Barber
2014-08-31 22:35 ` David Lang
2014-08-21 6:56 ` David Lang
2014-08-21 7:04 ` David Lang
2014-08-21 9:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-21 19:49 ` David Lang
2014-08-21 19:57 ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2014-08-22 17:07 ` Jan Ceuleers
2014-08-22 18:27 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-21 8:58 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-22 23:34 ` David Lang
2014-08-22 23:41 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-22 23:52 ` David Lang
2014-08-22 23:56 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-23 0:03 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-21 9:23 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-08-21 9:30 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-22 23:30 ` David Lang
2014-08-22 23:40 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-20 8:30 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-08-21 6:58 ` David Lang
2014-08-24 3:49 Hal Murray
2014-08-24 3:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-08-24 5:14 ` David Lang
2014-08-25 7:43 ` Michael Welzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140821195735.GA1719@sesse.net \
--to=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox