From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992EA21F449 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lf10so9061022pab.15 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5o8MMBNoCAgP3BSchafrsjQhWd57fEWYv7t+kYtcDlA=; b=Nv8g1mf4ezZSQbx0UXbQbALwtMw8eBzxqT+kU1ypJ+WuJLFFLFvUtYjXWYjTfrPrLh xSAuB/J/5EAzp4vThhPhGHWYfxq0rrfT5IeNLPFTfBjysXmQxf420YApB7OLjI7Q9wUA GPf3xoRaEVuVYsYlikgv/Xo46fp+rK5XGb1hy6Tg3CB+Js8g9IFY9jiC3rqiVLUI0hME iwxVarSs1Zu1X/lgsyPHJr4/rl+u5DidvSNINhrpSGlJPp5kSBHilaB8aXveP1G0gqIQ Dp+HqjEjYZDkSMG6pO4Mpt76YVrfSSMmU+EoK3Md7zbWw5pPgEW1tNPRTUQ1/XFt+8zM u2ww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBZ92HNrmD61adbdDYOwEwM0v88BxmAUWoqUBAVDtyDOApLo2Ts0QB7dkuZuyQxgkFbtx6 X-Received: by 10.68.99.226 with SMTP id et2mr8776296pbb.52.1409435599109; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-65-80.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.65.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm5502999pdh.41.2014.08.30.14.53.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:53:15 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jonathan Morton Message-ID: <20140830145315.627fa185@urahara> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cerowrt-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels -> WNDR3800 can't cope... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:53:19 -0000 On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:02:57 +0300 Jonathan Morton wrote: > It seems that TBF has dire warnings all over it about having limited packet-rate capacity which depends on the value of HZ, while HTB has some sort of solution to that problem. Packet scheduling has not depended on HZ for 3 or more years. It uses what ever clock source is available and high resolution timers. As happens in legacy code comments no longer match reality.