From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
	(ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7418B21F5D0
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C99406060; 
	Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:36:19 -0700
Message-Id: <20140905083619.D7C99406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Subject: [Bloat] UCLA, Cisco & more join forces to replace TCP/IP
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:36:49 -0000

http://www.networkworld.com/article/2602109/lan-wan/ucla-cisco-more-join-force
s-to-replace-tcpip.html

    "Their aim is to put forth an Internet architecture that's more secure,
     able to support more bandwidth and friendlier to app developers.
     Cryptographic authentication, flow balance and adaptive
     routing/forwarding are among the key underlying principles."

I wonder if bufferbloat is on their radar?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.