From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD5421F1AB for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0D1406062; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:41:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Hal Murray Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:41:26 -0700 Message-Id: <20140913194126.5B0D1406062@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> Cc: Hal Murray Subject: [Bloat] Measuring Latency X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 19:42:09 -0000 > When reading it, it strikes me, that you don't directly tell them what to > do; e.g. add a latency test during upload and download. ... Does round trip latency have enough info, or do you need to know how much is contributed by each direction? If I gave you a large collection of latency data from a test run, how do you reduce it to something simple that a marketer could compare with the results from another test run? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.