From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6747521F538 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 02:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XVGZZ-0007Z6-6Z; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:17 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XVGZY-00078e-TD; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:16 +0200 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:16 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Dave Taht Message-ID: <20140920090316.GA25876@sesse.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.16.2 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] I feel an urge to update this X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:03:51 -0000 On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 02:33:06AM +0300, Dave Taht wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gettys-iw10-considered-harmful-00 The pedant in me wants to point out that 4 -> 10 is not “2.5 times worse”, but “2.5 times as bad” or “1.5 times worse” (just as 4 -> 5 is “20% worse”, “0.2 times worse” or “1.2 times as bad”). :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/