From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
To: sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] RED against bufferbloat
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:06:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201502250806.t1P86o5N011632@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502250737150.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Sahil,
At 06:46 25/02/2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, sahil grover wrote:
>
>>(i) First of all,i want to know whether RED was implemented or not?
>>if not then what were the reasons(major) ?
>
>RED has been available on most platforms, but it was generally not
>turned on. It also needs configuration from an operator, and it's
>hard to know how to configure.
About a decade ago my company (BT) widely deployed RED in the
upstream 'head-end' of our global MPLS network, i.e. the likely
bottleneck in the customer edge router where the customer's LAN
traffic enters their access link. We deployed it as WRED, i.e.
different configurations of RED across the various diffserv classes,
in order to minimise queuing latency in all the classes, including
the lowest priority class. A configuration calculator was developed
to help the engineers during set up. We still use this setup
successfuly today, including for all our particularly latency
sensitive customers in the finance sector.
We did not deploy RED on our broadband platform (ie public Internet),
altho in retrospect we should have done, because any AQM is much
better than none. We're fixing that now.
>>(ii)Second, as we all know RED controls the average queue size from
>>growing.
>>So it also controls delay in a way or we can say is a solution to
>>bufferbloat problem. Then why it was not considered.
>
>It was designed to fix "bufferbloat" long before the bufferbloat
>word was even invented. It's just that in practice, it doesn't work
>very well. RED is configured with a drop probability slope at
>certain buffer depths, and that's it. It doesn't react or change
>depending on conditions. You have to guess at configure-time.
>
>What we need are mechanisms that work better in real life and that
>are adaptive.
If you were prepared to read a paper, I would have suggested:
"The New AQM Kids on the Block: An Experimental Evaluation of CoDel and PIE"
<http://infocom2014.ieee-infocom.org/GI14-slides/GI14-s2-3.pdf>
This compares CoDel and PIE against Adaptive RED, which was a variant
of RED proposed by Sally Floyd & co-authors in 2001 and available
since Linux kernel version 3.3. ARED addressed the configuration
sensitivity problem of RED by adapting the parameters to link rate
and load conditions.
The paper convinced me that ARED is good enough (in the paper's
simulations it was often better than PIE or CoDel), at least for
links with fixed rate (or only occasionally varying rate like DSL).*
This is important for us because it means we can consider deploying
AQM by adding soft controls on top of the RED implementations we
already have in existing equipment. This could reduce deployment
completion time from decades to a few months.
* I'm not sure ARED would be able to cope with the rapidly changing
rate of a wireless link tho.
HTH
Bob
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe, BT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 15:43 sahil grover
2015-02-24 16:13 ` Matt Mathis
2015-02-24 22:39 ` Kathleen Nichols
2015-02-25 6:46 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 6:54 ` David Lang
2015-02-25 6:59 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 8:29 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-02-25 8:06 ` Bob Briscoe [this message]
2015-02-25 8:42 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-02-25 9:18 ` Michael Welzl
2015-02-25 9:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-25 10:10 ` Michael Welzl
2015-02-25 10:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-25 10:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 11:04 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-25 18:39 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
2015-02-26 9:01 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-26 10:39 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 10:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-26 10:44 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 10:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-26 10:59 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-26 11:12 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-27 0:26 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-26 10:45 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-26 11:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-26 12:59 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 11:26 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-26 12:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 13:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-25 13:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 13:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-25 14:05 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 18:51 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
2015-02-25 14:16 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-25 16:09 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-25 17:34 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-25 17:56 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-26 12:54 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 14:06 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-26 14:18 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 15:18 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-02-26 17:04 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-26 18:07 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-26 18:33 ` [Bloat] RE : " luca.muscariello
2015-02-26 18:59 ` [Bloat] " Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-26 19:44 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
2015-02-26 20:42 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-26 21:50 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-25 16:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-25 10:54 ` Michael Welzl
2015-02-25 11:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-02-25 12:08 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-25 19:04 ` David Lang
2015-02-25 19:30 ` Michael Welzl
2015-02-25 9:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-02-25 10:37 ` Michael Welzl
2015-02-25 10:54 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-02-25 17:28 ` Bob Briscoe
2015-02-25 18:03 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-26 9:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-25 17:57 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-25 19:25 Hal Murray
2015-02-25 20:00 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201502250806.t1P86o5N011632@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk \
--to=bob.briscoe@bt.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=sahilgrover013@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox