From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mx1.redhat.com",
	Issuer "DigiCert SHA2 Extended Validation Server CA" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F6221F196
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2V57jaq032601
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=FAIL); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:07:45 -0400
Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-40.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.40])
	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id t2V57eeP012051; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:07:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:07:35 +1300
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Tumusok <pedro.tumusok@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150331180735.0abd31fc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACQiMXYbO5EvWx4HWUxkTdG8KcedjT7dmgwMQd4ui_hXTY8VfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org>
	<15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca>
	<CAJq5cE1UFgt6fpLxRH7m3VFUpziGZm9OLCCNFQ93QemH00CHaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1426773234.362612992@apps.rackspace.com>
	<CAA93jw5c_qzqPQdpnUPXi_QwuRwAjVEVdGUG02LBFfj2fs91LQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1309C0B.FD59F%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
	<1426796961.194223197@apps.rackspace.com>
	<D130B233.46568%g.white@cablelabs.com>
	<5FD20B4A-A7E8-48C0-89F9-E2EB86DED8A6@gmail.com>
	<CACQiMXY0Rcj+=EedZ7T6=cCBG+j7wRA9e11Ry_g3YuGxLhBWYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<755FC1BE-141C-42FD-B3E3-564488982665@gmail.com>
	<CACQiMXZgQqqvR1=P38Zym504NVF2TATeHuFVzcM6Fd9MAgZCSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<95B0F8DA-7650-4064-BEE6-F0CDF936D33A@gmail.com>
	<CACQiMXYZ+9jBNTc30-C-RNapn0mpcGVL0MKnvx=QjcR5Bon01g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7Jh2h+HAgFQ7dkkBx6o47_2DsWvz-C_09q-jVjg6Yu1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACQiMXYbO5EvWx4HWUxkTdG8KcedjT7dmgwMQd4ui_hXTY8VfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	"dpreed@reed.com" <dpreed@reed.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS
 3+ recommendation?)
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:08:16 -0000


On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:05:19 +0200 Pedro Tumusok <pedro.tumusok@gmail.com> wrote:

[...] 
> That is feature creep, we originally discussed having continuous ping
> measurement under load.
> New ideas not so welcome ;)

I agree, we just want Justin (http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest) to
also measure and report on ping/latency under load.

After we have this basic step, we can refine it further, e.g. with
Jonathan HZ measurement.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer