From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AEB421F572 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YjY9f-0000BI-D2 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:11:51 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YjY9f-0007JI-6i for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:11:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:11:51 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20150418191151.GA21021@sesse.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.18.4 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat in switches and routers X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:12:25 -0000 On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:07:26PM -0700, Ketan Kulkarni wrote: > I think we would have similar concerns for switches and routers. (E.g. > cat3k switches or Cisco 5760 controllers just to name) For Cat3k switches, I can assure you there's no bufferbloat -- they are badly underbuffered. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/