From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F4221F2B9 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 07:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YmNT6-0001lf-Sl for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 16:23:37 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YmNT6-0009sn-Mn for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 16:23:36 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 16:23:36 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20150426142336.GA24211@sesse.net> References: <553B2863.2020600@gmail.com> <553BA193.1030907@gmail.com> <553C84FE.5070101@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.18.4 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [Bloat] Adblock - or another extension - is incorrectly blocking the speed test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:24:16 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:00:31AM +1000, jb wrote: > No, I'm not going to do that. I absolutely hate even _considering_ changing > how I want to do something for an extension that doesn't know the difference > between an IP address and a script. What about if the user is behind NAT64? IP literals won't work at all in that case. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/