From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A53121F24A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymkl5-0005cW-Jj; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:15:44 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymkl5-0008il-Eg; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:15:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:15:43 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" Message-ID: <20150427151543.GA10035@sesse.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.18.4 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bloat] sch_fq and sk->sk_pacing_rate X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:16:24 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:56:38PM +0000, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote: > Oops- I seem to have hit send too quickly. I think setsockopt(sockfd, > SOL_SOCKET, SO_MAX_PACING_RATE, &val, sizeof(val)) is the call I am looking > for. I was looking on an older kernel when I wrote the first note. > > Comments still welcome on it use, though. cubemap uses it. It works great. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/