From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0700021F1EB for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMwT-0003W5-IW for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:26:58 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMwT-0007Ll-D6 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:26:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:26:57 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20150518152657.GA26792@sesse.net> References: <14d5800ec08.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net> <1431919815.385726792@apps.rackspace.com> <55597353.2010408@superduper.net> <14d67011de0.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net> <1431961775.459218261@apps.rackspace.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431961775.459218261@apps.rackspace.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 3.18.4 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] heisenbug: dslreports 16 flow test vs cablemodems X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:04 -0000 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:09:35AM -0400, dpreed@reed.com wrote: > I'm curious as to why one would need low priority class if you were using > fq_codel? Because when I'm playing a YouTube video of cute cats, I consider that infinitely more important than the latest newfangled Windows update. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/