From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B1521F883 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNiy1-0001XG-F9; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:53 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNiy1-0008P7-By; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:49:53 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Sebastian Moeller Message-ID: <20150807144953.GC27438@sesse.net> References: <4EDA85BE-CD86-4DA9-8ED5-78500E858F79@baylink.com> <20150807142337.GA22258@sesse.net> <6C2C7178-A999-4555-BA5E-7E951006C4C5@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C2C7178-A999-4555-BA5E-7E951006C4C5@gmx.de> X-Operating-System: Linux 4.2.0-rc5 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Fwd: Did *bufferbloat* cause the 2010 flashcrash? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 14:49:56 -0000 On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Sebastian Moeller wrote: >> switching to IP-level fairness makes life hard for the torrent >> user (not that it seems to even exist in fq_codel; > fq_codel does not care as far as I know one can specify different > hashing schemes (expect I have not tried it myself so that might not > work). How? I've searched for it, I've checked the documentation, I've looked for it in the code. What am I missing? > Actually, one of the more frequent requests on the openwrt forum > seems to be bit torrent users who want per-internal-IP fairness, or > in other words want to be able to dedicate a box to torrenting > without sacrificing all egress bandwidth to the bit-torrent deity ;) Yes, per-internal-IP fairness would go a long way. It's not a perfect solution by itself, but at least that user only messes up for him/herself. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/