From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7402B3B2A6 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:10:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e65so156959637pfe.1 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:10:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2zM7UnhO/fYK5EhvjPCxHwxD7VFP7R5MIC4KTe9GWSY=; b=I8zFY28BqUpWFztE/XrlAyaSUjV+yDqyfszSIBiqmXwqDytnWNz6yuOOf/mdRVAm0e 6KUl1A3ji41R5TK6XbMZTqwsDkgxOgphZAcLn0TB9tz+HHv7pPBZCqXAzm1ntSrOM+QT //PxDEyHd0zvXZPU0dDuhruI4w2J9qifqXk79S5vDGc+iCxaCyd/ZPdVubNV6os1x0f+ a+3SIjittgpTS+DKUb6pIWFOZrV5SDorUf/+SQsnU+mCLydx28+F27JsV6K5RQEX3lCv Vzlanu/1HrCUb2kyjsyHx6HGTcxcOhBn5cnKF6UTmXJrxbKuoEYkAMtBrat5krRU2NWZ QMBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2zM7UnhO/fYK5EhvjPCxHwxD7VFP7R5MIC4KTe9GWSY=; b=loe8iRsRtKHuXWNmTUQYuShvgpWykOS1wEzzgjkFkNZnxcfTCALFh5IElH2Y8z3RQy 7o2KvJ6V976gDohSlbnyoLNiZEJE3j14vvD7quehLuC/H9czcHQoszG54YVGJILO9rdV AeFB9CuJN7g/yPo/mr4IPvaFS050kbWzizrihvXLO5xqvMJXvSXdIkhrbeQN2FK35/uI YOh8wHUFszHv1+4Bhzyq6DRLTG6MTpq8qPhcsRrsT9VF2109E0mk0aKOWU7gjG5oVz/c TXSuc0Cfx9oRsCGL13jQxJ3r1h/e62yM9w0ljXGo3P2O3Vm3XfiMG3oF3DQsHGJC/TM2 Im1w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3DR94gI+cBn+/gTO/EkdXv78xqjAYFkrBTZ1oMLiV2Xcr6kyDRuIJNvRvtfCsfzUUFOmHsTgxWntXero27Yr7L3Xk7g== X-Received: by 10.98.8.82 with SMTP id c79mr107976364pfd.122.1451952618101; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:10:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q190sm123354055pfq.59.2016.01.04.16.10.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:10:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:10:25 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Dave =?UTF-8?B?VMOkaHQ=?= Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20160104161025.3861dbc5@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <568B025D.70808@taht.net> References: <568B025D.70808@taht.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat email list server upgrade going slow and badly X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:10:21 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:38:05 -0800 Dave T=C3=A4ht wrote: > all the bufferbloat.net servers are in the process of migrating to a > new co-location facility. the lists - if not the archives - should be > alive again, at least. >=20 > There is a stupid bug somewhere stopping the archived pages from > making the web. >=20 > I am concerned if anyone's bloat email is now auto-ending up in a spam > folder? (if so, please send response privately) (this email is also a > test) >=20 > The redmine webserver move is troublesome, also. >=20 > Further more, the mailman web service is under persistent attack by > a set of 286 (so far) ips flooding it with subscription requests, and > linode itself has been under enormous attack over the holidays... >=20 > there will be ssl updates and the like once all this is sorted but it > might take a week or two more. I might give up and try another co-lo also. >=20 > In the meantime, why not top it all off with breakfast at milliways? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat Talk to davem, maybe kernel.org would be safer/better more robust?