From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D583B29E for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:06:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWVhu-0004ZZ-11; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:06:22 +0100 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWVht-0006iQ-VB; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:06:21 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:06:21 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Neal Cardwell Cc: Hans-Kristian Bakke , bloat Message-ID: <20170125220621.GA22074@sesse.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 4.9.0 on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [Bloat] Initial tests with BBR in kernel 4.9 X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:06:25 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 05:01:04PM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote: > Nope, BBR needs pacing to work correctly, and currently fq is the only > Linux qdisc that implements pacing. I really wish sch_fq was renamed sch_pacing :-) And of course that we had a single qdisc that was ideal for both end hosts and routers (especially since some machines act as both). /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/