From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sesse@samfundet.no>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no
 [IPv6:2001:67c:29f4::29])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C4A3B2A4
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  8 Sep 2017 03:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50])
 by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <sesse@samfundet.no>) id 1dqDlv-00025t-IX
 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:32:19 +0200
Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <sesse@samfundet.no>) id 1dqDlv-0000zn-Ea
 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:32:15 +0200
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:32:15 +0200
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Message-ID: <20170908073215.dba5utrwuwvruw55@sesse.net>
References: <CAA93jw7Rwrbv1em9zJvFoFPSfPiNWoc4sdOHL==xZUDNiujNVA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7Rwrbv1em9zJvFoFPSfPiNWoc4sdOHL==xZUDNiujNVA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Linux 4.11.12 on a x86_64
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Subject: Re: [Bloat] dash traffic "chunklets" verses pie and fq_codel
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 07:32:21 -0000

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:52:54PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> good read:
> 
> http://caia.swin.edu.au/cv/jkua/preprint/jkua-icccn2017-chunklets-preprint-10may17.pdf

Aaaaa!

“For example, FQ-CoDel isolates individual traffic flows into
sub-queues then serves each sub-queue with a Deficit Round
Robin (DRR) scheduler. The result is relatively even capacity
sharing, which may actually be detrimental to a DASH flow
(often a single, persistent TCP connection) that is competing
with multiple other concurrent TCP flows.”

Isn't this just an AQM sabotage scheme?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/