General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Y <intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] About Setting Bandwidth limit with or without ethernet overhead?
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:48:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108064830.6c6a9682@raspberrypi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y3a4lma8.fsf@taht.net>

Hi , Dave
Thank you for your reply.

I should show you tc-stab setting.

My connection is PPPoA via ethernet. PC connects ethernet directly.

####stab linklayer atm overhead -4

I add PPPoA overhead 10 + Ethernet overhead -14 = -4
But, settled Bandwith is 98% of link speed ( I mean this is
settled bandwidth without ethernet overhead).

I should shape more?

Thanks.

On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:28:47 -0800
Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:

> Y <intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr> writes:
> 
> > Hi, I am Yutaka.
> >
> > I connect internet via ethenet.	
> > Shoud I set Bandwidth limit with or without ethernet overhead in any
> > qdiscs?
> > When I measured , It seems setting without ethernet overhead is
> > correct.  
> 
> It depends on your next hop's framing. If you are on ethernet going to
> ethernet, then you should set ethernet. If you are on ethernet,
> going through a cablemodem, set docsis. If you are on ethernet, going
> through dsl or something else, you set the framing appropriately.
> 
> Without setting the framing appropriately you can run into
> situations where your shaper can be 60% in accurate (dsl).
> 
> >
> > Thanks.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat  


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05  7:12 Y
2018-11-07 19:28 ` Dave Taht
2018-11-07 21:48   ` Y [this message]
2018-11-07 21:54     ` Y
2018-11-07 22:13     ` Y
     [not found]       ` <22A986F3-2A99-466E-9C03-2343503FE807@gmx.de>
2018-11-08  0:06         ` Y
2018-11-08  0:35           ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-11-08  2:17             ` Y
2018-11-08 16:57               ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-11-08 20:15                 ` Y
2018-11-11  2:21             ` [Bloat] Congrats linux kernel 4.19 applied cake qdisc Y

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181108064830.6c6a9682@raspberrypi \
    --to=intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave@taht.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox