From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 713413CB35 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:26:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588595189; bh=u9AJecrxxYLSv+wYfQPbyzGQTxgeSbEPyNBkHuaPsSw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject; b=NBIRnxDXWI8tT3WdKVtz7th26bJ4UIsMb06P+oNuBbuFjYOV5NENPBAtBTID1cCVZ D0r3bbv9xcHSrn8uCxab5VxW3Em6OsJH+Q5x8OlEDhU0ZdP+tZrEjmFh0ejGUwRcIk 78NFaY7lq9upEWd2oTgvZdLV8h1TRh0ORSb5zbXc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from atomix.home.lan ([82.207.236.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAONX-1jPpoE1Ua3-00BtbN for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 14:26:29 +0200 Received: from lake.home.lan ([172.20.1.22]) by atomix.home.lan with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVaCo-0006f8-AB for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 04 May 2020 14:28:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:26:26 +0200 From: Richard =?UTF-8?B?RnLDtmhuaW5n?= To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20200504142626.1104b959@lake.home.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wJukuCZLs31xejw1swtbnlsFieo4aZS1mFF8icLVRf1RzZSp79W Od5URyuHh9Jbv6Wt4OqjjGoxPSvw0AmW81/Qtk6ERI/iEI4L3INfpIAYUKx3/UzQ+bSYZg3 /S6ixy1CvON4qJfSUlHG1MDqV/lURAk7f5BxEKimpAgml8+kTFq3ceesQXHnXrjleRqaXil CUw3XkXXryflidRS5jxlw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:bzo80twJR+o=:NXR1l9M4aATQVwR20ODeVo yZOrTFR5vNyNpHGB2eDblPm7bZNR0oTxCyB9Rlr174uEeLVOmQyCH1i1cHQn1eP85tYmBAEKw rmw9Q7rFejyOJmWIzPMtj0IdLKBdd38kTUZhtc4I5BD9EXsJXcxdWFuxV1DHkECeBpAzoH4j0 4MrndzR6ckCxbu7lPd7K/L6xrKuwlzOU9ZKEeRp2Dkj3TnhqeWBUAg616C766n8DnXoEwX5Bl j/gCdTW7+aCv6EKogQH27AoE1l7V4ng3UCeHNfuHlG8YNWIf8AzINJp+w3SuhhAGCsyBLHSNx SlZC708juAogBey6l1FfEFYnyTtMCdMJPw+soq3ZEwZVGpUlphelJ0TCVAJ/ggdrKqmBH2sLP r4ZvmZqT207C6wVv2Mp7Zi0+b3xZWh+do4BYpBJVG7L8qZ0naF8rQZGb8DPKwgZND7pErB8jY /RNhp6rFurHyLtSPx5rQY+X9SNZllcwLsJS3UflgZ+fqgbOmm9m6HPfX0tS/B8VS4X18TZgX8 sB0f1r0RrtZhWjLfRrqwRjiAiFhG0/LpW3jmDZpJHgCbKbllr9oPCRao6v9GppS8MY2oN9lZd xM47Hl6ANDwQQll04R1Ph7a3KM+VFYqZb47hnL+QzXFK8KoA6+VB1tYTdw7XKTVzk8/R1cUiB cYa0Lh6jgYxE/f26Mm4RFIbbDOmi9vhMH5acNWU5l7iZ1CEdfU/uXrZyVZ0+w3ED1YS8OVjh2 s1zciQrKVWhVife1p9XsreTxbGsXbxzAni7rNtSLvRerzD3r9Rnn9ZQbHYk+oNRiCRQzjDTp/ sCqOLHwwFj/5YN507BwpEaGWxG/pEmcQx6cSE/my3L5OJnM1kjLl5ytGCAgjNPwZCqenu1v48 E4O5Gp72ardmy4m/n3C4xc2SunWuI9cE+S0qLdL8bNfFHyNmhDRbyFgzete5BftPWcQxGYiAM GsiSibq1GMPHmqEth5lvPZZ5rX5ODMHGEYcDgSObb41qVaSDoSp1ZEkJiU+mwEcRbB2yp3O3p CVwY3ubq1teEN4J2xLzONkx26Ou4gPQ2yDAgZxqJIE5zYtAIW8tdTTBfhZc5axlKq0cf5pdot 9rgz4K9kcZNIHbi2j44hTgQCtzUzxlMCMQsqesPsbm2vo8J4UGwrq7CrTG0JFNdp0tp32vDD5 LA6r1NxRBa/Xu8iuZAOpw+k6QRrI9L6jC28cI7zmmBCFMexT8aU8Sx5icahx4647CX+01N5Uh 8agiu38onPio2f/lr Subject: [Bloat] Does it makes sense to shape traffic with 16Kbit/s up and 16Kbit/s down? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 12:26:30 -0000 And if so, which queue discipline would work best with it? Background: I am forced to use my cell phone as uplink and after I reach the monthly limit, bandwidth will be reduces to given up/downlink speeds. I know Surfing websites with those speeds will take forever - however it should be enough to send/receive emails and/or use a messenger. Richard