From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9B93CB35 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 11:47:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588607246; bh=V/WQrRt11XLdBZHd6VoxJSu7Gdm0yC/INssrSBA+dtE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=DInAEyh+hZfNPE0Yf/cdKzchPYddvrqpqArdFn1aTOXH4hYzK2cYAgBe9gllZW66C EeVcWtC6S9QdqJBKiVzDgFjHbZPBe/Q/r4DYLYVRhCxSGn6bSXKJwRan351Ny0/DP/ PnM0EVcBKmGWXDgSuwkZxREG66Fwck0vGnYcNdTc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from atomix.home.lan ([82.207.236.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1My32F-1jDwhu46Wd-00zTDa for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 17:47:26 +0200 Received: from lake.home.lan ([172.20.1.22]) by atomix.home.lan with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVdLG-0000RP-Rs for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 04 May 2020 17:49:14 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:47:23 +0200 From: Richard =?UTF-8?B?RnLDtmhuaW5n?= To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20200504174723.3b2143a3@lake.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200504142626.1104b959@lake.home.lan> References: <20200504142626.1104b959@lake.home.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:XzzHVf/E2Pc0Ge+PlHTt9vOoU5p+Ek0ZgiVYx4LKbAo5rB5DRwg jk2MWE0PJxhfuiTxOdpg8MJqA6pZhboslyZmBFmZoF3B4tvjukk4zplv5rfFRN4CXZ3l3GM y7YpvvStB2WJxl5X1X31CgRhwTOMnQh45HSRvrtfc/+NeN+8mk15L73ylPz8qIywSoD3vZT 9ul1zcyWnc2XiL44unfbw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+nU6LaCh7Ok=:YqO1AYUvtENRHTTGZvzzUx a5J38DBd0s/U2/9eOqqM7Dv4hCCblObmDmlVMC5XeBILX+uxhzhvSDpBily1HXlv0ksKpMFOX Q3StfKfBWDzTI9t90arZGZ86mWKc/7mSi3Yyfpkvuy+AHm5IugsK2jYeiDxvoCMQx/U9moocU wnrfs0zbhuj5yQ6554LRaO74poNOCII9AS0WsA7ZEj2dV0J48pNN1OSMUxTw9w+n7okdl6fNB WGqyYDmazOA0xY0gbG6nVQKMV5ZkwP/jQBnjnTjYzkAvUK7arnqc3ybQvR7WMIi5dzu9ulHvB WkmhhomKTatvyDPy/VanewWTNNJq/aGhsyrAcGHmQh6jYobEs6zy5UkKpcu11rqYWee1ZxV7x s2SS4y+VOsLtVAez+RJyMOQ/Z/AAuS3zUmv7fTVwyTf8ZmVQ3H38MRGw/sEOE5rU2zV41jd+s vk09cZNpdU+R+j6XR1yr+o8JCf1zXhG8gXj/ux0ksHBVP+UXlcK+VAo14IqbC4aunvUptEWLH I1PbIriFQEHLUhNwVKQQotYl8kPId1LMTeKYwd8bmuLurjPiUWE8el7AvOjAIBA8svmmrRurt RMfmsPc003ZEnzYYb2UBNkS25dZxAQ8A/PXbcu4nPr/OE5T8/LQkxXFZwn54BX54H3MVPs6kB nW04RLAaYP98d1h5keFH8tWwIFaAZpW/2J7YDQTPVV48jQ8rIaxLHZEXF21Uhgcbhkl4bKlKD yFGVuTRtZxH8AUeaY4hlJtPTQi67qdYv+TyAIn9HpQ+dNmlqwpyJvG/oygwhhOQNfbt9pp1x9 ALhrQrpdCIyh7wNsuy2/AwRDrDnkXmMd8lvHt0evAx3q8oXBkcjMO5t87pvM+uEK7sdmUGjY6 QQOQ+o1l60rVpgKFKxmvzcUogQ86hhUtzZe7Qmk2ga+qPxrgXyq3T8Vj1wv5TA8efZxRhCdLb LcgPGghQQngKfePnYH4zZsACOKw93BXFKd54dNXC/7EkzdE1G2rbZILxTqKTimrCaLdxXGcpD KVbeQnsajE58OgM8Wf8YocVw8KxpU/7s3osMFSz88Npvz+dVWm5b+Eou1bx27BDXUcSg9URh8 ny7wbyE0uq43IiuFP4EonByP4eLeJ5EPhvvGCrI8+cI/iTaYJqptra9gu0rBJh49oIHIvZIN2 OTKhQGa1cTeeYoF9HHc7Q3ik/o2Jsva79bY3KCbKzXgJmA6RvRtwLiUS6tpjwUYlz1rrPidhZ EA4FvoGS7dpUph5La Subject: Re: [Bloat] Does it makes sense to shape traffic with 16Kbit/s up and 16Kbit/s down? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 15:47:27 -0000 Thanks for your insights. I will set MTU and cake options accordingly. I have a VPN provider which support lzo-compression. If I were to use VPN through the 16Kbps it could squeeze out some bytes. I guess in that case I shape the tunX interface, right? Would the MTU setting be on the usb0 device and/or the tunX? Richard