From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A223CB35 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:25:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588663529; bh=7VAlOourmaLbhp75MNJ2xMkJxrqdNJFW/oGW9XIHLAc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=gX3O7S6P6/lWlSx/aX6OhoQWYUCwL4hKg8fPKE7/d85CRBQO0UiPDrgXYWYQIwRpn 1pDDfwM698SnWnxvQla6/Hvg4yZEYqOuztCTgxTqv5BZFIxe4iqi+xLflXottkl9kp IHmNPs4ydmresNFTCw4PKkaYo7QEz2j6UnpAQVpY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from atomix.home.lan ([94.134.179.135]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M42jK-1jVrxJ3G7c-0000Dt; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:25:29 +0200 Received: from lake.home.lan ([172.20.1.22]) by atomix.home.lan with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVrz5-0001jS-1j; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:27:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:25:27 +0200 From: Richard =?UTF-8?B?RnLDtmhuaW5n?= To: Jonathan Morton Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20200505092527.37f2d13b@lake.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <3BC32291-814F-4665-BD91-EBF4B0022444@gmail.com> References: <20200504142626.1104b959@lake.home.lan> <20200504174723.3b2143a3@lake.home.lan> <3BC32291-814F-4665-BD91-EBF4B0022444@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:N5O8tGi1OXc5fv6WbcHSpKCfOuqgzGtij7TVc3E2uoumvR0Jma8 wOr444d9A5hJ+IxbvgyFFPqy0yJFvt0qHVIh8mH881Nyf+ChIkFtM4EGQdmvBDfh6IMCDHn MowTEHNdt4vZScYEqXJKocK3SrR/SW0OsFjAhHabNdT8IM6TMmP5NtdOA6hPDHxHMGYIxvI qVLB8RTgZR0KhP6Hsh7hA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:2RFYZXZ8unc=:ATzgTChfoXom5jIcmcAwDR UxJLLz0ZmDyszU4APf078OVAOT5oF1/5cqI9MzEJXfzUkEAdcJZwNdCkmg2+rM+RorO+zAbo2 L1JzZ7iAyppk/TVH3pRBkU5KnE5xtovqNH2bB2vuyCQLJxyN8O7ozBnL2sin9QdZmgVVfGyFO lL1uhcK47kbHd/D65VRFoNZjlJdkk1r+JKOY3634NZVYQjZDOLmBohFnoKAUri7XFY1fQcofO SPwipWHF1FsL08DV2A4InliudUTiNAylFIiMo2jwnesCxZwpNCYBCcMygWvOUH1TYZ8ZoF+Sl KVPwXoIToMtBzGQNCZinTI9rLxAgSnTrTYIutQOffMst+c7IuJ765p2TJeEfN8eRzf4RXicaJ kBU5Z5/t/hpv6o/N35GUoaZdvdEYoPh2wceC48H8C2eEiguHBZq8oZxFiI5K6DzA7R8CgZOJD TeBLOOtF7wocnPctLi3BDh01KVcDRZzFePguw3z30N5H81Kwz0XELrQY/WASmguciOgF3qk/l cVYmtihxekIuGJAPd30O9h9wy8zWWEaTL39+N5QsJjqNCO2QF4G++oJ3EbL3XuW5RdM06EXLe 5jJXVOjYAEGnB82eJDFvr8BEU04VDGugFmULiumKWZwecPuo//h50tReF5Oo+x1/Ts3P8mbL9 zxvD72aMORsZbC0nKlEfIfX9dy8VgRUzF5eX/UdThABL1yqbIE1AkZ2RUle7PuGLrafUZX7sr oxOm5t8MhaRLKm4u2XyxKYImc/dcVUrDWjpuccY1gOx/5XMspG1jNEFjSMj+hJ6KGZnNcJZ1A QbAqdUEv+GZsD08wWHsw9Hmdjh4jH8RIElt12bjzYwK8keUKgCvJFBk5HNSmgEm5kjtukRgqB mJNBZdJCKuonCLkmRFP7MBx+Kv6p7yqRjyvYvkiYePaV6JywpaE1IXNIRMRKlddfGCqumBgrR TnmmojoftSQGjkcu4KvsA15ZaHfmI/B0vf1OBV7rgkDAD+Xohm7QWZKV5UEvrU5kKT31b9sDu AhrfpTIzXzl12a8FGau95nlz17t7/XN0wFDaEBt/TnX+Kn2hprkNfNrPXfUZCeMgdeD8rmGDs Ae+JKUZ3heDT7TgCOugZ5JrTwmg2su0ofCG0pjG3JudTlbZbQUjZq5DAXYS3Bm0yj6HZtoUAZ V8ZtDwb8FmBEl6ZjEKsdNjVOkprZWv6CHUlkrn4XYAQwyQSMq/xzThJmP5J4O/UIYeH8C/RkL 3nR+BtB0O2w5tsdS0 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Does it makes sense to shape traffic with 16Kbit/s up and 16Kbit/s down? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 07:25:31 -0000 On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:51:59 +0300 Jonathan Morton wrote: > You should set the qdisc and those options on the *physical* device, > not the one that carries your uncompressed data. Don't forget to set > up ingress shaping as well as egress. > Not sure what you are trying to say here. The physical interface is usb0 and it carries uncompressed data - the tun0 interface however is compressing the data. Another point would be to the shaper all traffic looks the same if I use OpenVPN and shape the physical interface. So I should shape the tun0 interface and let all traffic go through it. I can set max mtu in OpenVPN too. So correct me if I am wrong, but I think I should shape the tun0 interface. Richard