From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Received: from mail7c25.carrierzone.com (mail462c25.carrierzone.com
 [209.235.146.232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58DB3CB48
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:37:24 -0500 (EST)
X-POP-User: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
Feedback-ID: hmurray@megapat
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
 (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69])
 by mail7c25.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 10MNbDv8007796
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:37:20 +0000
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B911406061;
 Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:37:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:37:10 -0800
Message-Id: <20210122233710.1B911406061@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=BpfjPrf5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:117
 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=EmqxpYm9HcoA:10
 a=vnREMb7VAAAA:8 a=_GnSxkx0i2d_gy67gY0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
 a=voZrjb6_8qcA:10
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F27.600B61B3.0037, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000,
 reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules: 
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-Origin-Country: US
Subject: [Bloat] Measuring CoDel
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:37:24 -0000


Toke said:
> Yeah, the overhead of CoDel itself (and even FQ-CoDel) is basically nil (as
> in, we have not been able to measure it), when otherwise doing forwarding
> using the regular Linux stack. 

I may be able to help with that.

Are you familiar with Dick Sites' KUtrace?
  Stanford Seminar - KUtrace 2020
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HE7tSZGna0

The catch is that I've never used CoDel so somebody will have to teach me how 
to setup a test environment, and then show me the chunks in the kernel you 
want to measure.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.