From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de
 [IPv6:2001:638:208:120::220])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C753B29E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  1 Oct 2021 03:49:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de
 [IPv6:2001:638:208:ef34:0:ff:fe00:65])
 by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id
 1917nUDn180065
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); 
 Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:49:30 +0200
Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
 by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id
 1917nUPK019443
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:49:30 +0200
Received: (from auerswal@localhost)
 by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 1917nUFq019442;
 Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:49:30 +0200
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:49:30 +0200
From: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: basti.endres@fau.de
Message-ID: <20211001074930.GA17185@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
References: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
 <CAA93jw4J+5dvmWaTHRU3xTZTKFDS5prTNpvAJLwYBorvcLBPyg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4J+5dvmWaTHRU3xTZTKFDS5prTNpvAJLwYBorvcLBPyg@mail.gmail.com>
Author: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.999, tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-Spam-Score: (-0.999)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Fwd: Interop runner with satellite links
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 07:49:37 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:32:01PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> of interest to the bufferbloat lost. Nice work sebastian!
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Sebastian Endres <basti.endres@fau.de>
> Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:58 PM
> Subject: Interop runner with satellite links
> [...]
> for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available
> QUIC implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are
> available online: https://interop.sedrubal.de/

The web site gives an emulated RTT of 600ms.

When I worked on satellite based IP connectivity for cargo ships ten
years ago, I saw minimum (unloaded) RTTs of about 1.1s (1100ms) for both
LEO (Iridium back then) and GEO based systems.  Thus 600ms RTT seems
quite optimistic to me, at least from the point of view of a user of
satellite systems.

Thanks,
Erik
-- 
It's impossible to learn very much by simply sitting in a lecture,
or even by simply doing problems that are assigned.
                        -- Richard P. Feynman