From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:120::220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 782A23CB37 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 04:24:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:ef34:0:ff:fe00:65]) by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id 41Q9OL1L014056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:21 +0100 Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id 41Q9O5Nq002466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:05 +0100 Received: (from auerswal@localhost) by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 41Q9O5l3002461; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:05 +0100 From: Erik Auerswald To: Rich Brown Cc: bloat Message-ID: <20240226092405.GB18166@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> References: <86B99DBB-251A-4185-8D35-E33A762BF7B0@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Author: Erik Auerswald X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.009, tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 X-Spam-Score: (-1.009) X-Spam-Flag: NO Subject: Re: [Bloat] Disappointment on "Best Newcomer Router" front X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:24:09 -0000 Hi, On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 06:34:47PM -0500, Rich Brown via Bloat wrote: > [...] > Then they plug the new router's WAN port into their ISP modem's port, > connect their laptop's Ethernet to the LAN port, point their browser to > "openwrt.lan" How about "openwrt.local" to conform to mDNS (RFC 6762) and IANA's [special-use domain names][1]? Or perhaps "openwrt.internal" in the future? [1]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml > [...] Br, Erik