From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0086.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1687A21F3B0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Authentication-Results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; Received: from macbook_air_2015.elandem.org (81.2.115.113) by BLUPR06MB596.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.206.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:59:11 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Matthew Ford In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:58:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <22118EDD-F497-46F3-AC6A-A75C389DFBAB@isoc.org> References: To: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Originating-IP: [81.2.115.113] X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR05CA0006.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.40.16) To BLUPR06MB596.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.206.151) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR06MB596; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(51704005)(4001540100001)(92566002)(36756003)(2950100001)(110136001)(47776003)(82746002)(33656002)(230783001)(77156002)(62966003)(57306001)(77096005)(50226001)(66066001)(50986999)(76176999)(83716003)(50466002)(23676002)(87976001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(86362001)(46102003)(53416004)(40100003)(122386002)(42186005)(7099027)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB596; H:macbook_air_2015.elandem.org; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR06MB596; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR06MB596; X-Forefront-PRVS: 05568D1FF7 X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2015 14:59:11.5177 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB596 Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bloat] delay-under-load really helps diagnose real world problems X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:00:52 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:00:52 -0000 > On 23 Apr 2015, at 22:55, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) = wrote: >=20 > So, hats off to Justin! A big +1 to what Bill said from me. This tool is great and has already = helped me improve my own home network setup. A colleague noted that selecting =E2=80=98Public WiFi=E2=80=99 as = connection type results in no bloat measurements. Which connection types = are bloat measurements enabled for? What=E2=80=99s the plan for the = others? Mat=