General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com>
Cc: dpreed@deepplum.com, bloat-announce@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] closing up my make-wifi-fast lab
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:26:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2282D31E-CBEF-4B42-A6A6-4D6394EE0DF7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHb6LvpNHgKSX92DBquGg1FG_SE6V_A8pQaWfnwFyZc3NocEnQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On 27 Aug, 2018, at 9:00 am, Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com> wrote:
> 
> Curious to how LBT can be solved at the PHY level and if the potential solution sets preserve the end to end principle.

The usual alternatives include TDM, usually coordinated by a master device (eg. the AP); full-duplex operation via diplexers and/or orthogonal coding; and simply firing off a packet and retrying with exponential backoff if an acknowledgement is not heard.

TDM and diplexing are already used by both DOCSIS and LTE.  They are proven technology.  However, in DOCSIS the diplexing is greatly simplified by the use of a copper channel rather than airwaves, and in LTE the diplexer is fitted only at the tower, not in each client - so the tower can transmit and receive simultaneously, but an individual client cannot, but this is still useful because there are many clients per tower.  Effective diplexers for wireless are expensive.

Orthogonal coding is already used by GPS and, in a rather esoteric form, by MIMO-grade wifi.  IMHO it works rather better in GPS than in wifi.  In GPS, it allows all of the satellites in the constellation to transmit on the standard frequency simultaneously, while still being individually distinguishable.  The data rate is very low, however, since each satellite's signal inherently has a negative SNR (because there's a dozen others shouting over it) - that's why it takes a full minute for a receiver to get a fix from cold, because it simply takes that long to download the ephemeris from the first satellite whose signal is found.

A future version of wifi could reasonably use TDM, I think, but not diplexing.  The way this would work is that the AP assigns each station (including itself) a series of time windows in which to transmit as much as they like, and broadcasts this schedule along with its beacon.  Also scheduled would be windows in which the AP listens for new stations, including possibly other nearby APs with which it may mutually coordinate time.  A mesh network could thus be constructed entirely out of mutually coordinating APs if necessary.

The above paragraph is obviously a giant handwave...

 - Jonathan Morton


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-27  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-26 12:26 [Bloat] " David P. Reed
2018-08-27  6:00 ` [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] " Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  6:26   ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2018-08-27  7:06     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:52       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27  8:34         ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:11           ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:45             ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27 19:59               ` Bob McMahon
     [not found]               ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271431590.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:46                 ` Bob McMahon
     [not found]                   ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271750490.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:55                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 19:12               ` bkil
2018-08-30 19:17                 ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 20:36                   ` bkil
2018-09-03 19:30                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-09-06 18:44                     ` Jan Ceuleers
2018-08-27  7:24     ` Luca Muscariello
2018-08-27  7:39       ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:51         ` Luca Muscariello
2018-08-30 19:11 ` bkil
2018-08-27 22:37 Jonathan Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2282D31E-CBEF-4B42-A6A6-4D6394EE0DF7@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat-announce@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox