From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B491E201044
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat,  7 Apr 2012 11:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so1201603wib.10
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	bh=Vbd6yCpkhyuJTucoTng5FcsvkRW9jAgWSQ+rrDH7BzA=;
	b=KoaWtA+OCd8H2HWljtz+tc+g4Gm1utYjR+fP0xShdnZfvkAscNzHnQ7qr5VPwJZ1vV
	zZSa4fTtKkJvSOABsHHYvq0HTcRVjrspKLV7E3no81h2fl6cyOjEMTZo02P54xP1eml/
	7Rgu0qaJ6bkaf68Kwc3boskVYsGfnb1NnqeM8te9HhrY+2QTjQbfHnkGmAayZjZQ7WPe
	qkPfh/V8p6Lih6gPu4KRwSw57WztxyP38Y7LSa2an+I5qOCKKJuz5AlP9M6WxYHMb+mn
	jz5BNakAPfxol27f0rkb92uSq/LKZ5ULyWZ6VtuhlgiqlseFPnlYMNQ4W51AiHrT8ljX
	KefQ==
Received: by 10.180.20.175 with SMTP id o15mr4714303wie.6.1333823254821;
	Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi.
	[83.150.84.172])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5sm16478855wia.11.2012.04.07.11.27.33
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120407181034.GD21452@uio.no>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:27:32 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <25AFF8A5-B8C8-4DD3-984D-0D08326395B8@gmail.com>
References: <20120406213725.GA12641@uio.no>
	<CAA93jw4ZrRo70uqAG2AOBcXxKmv0T8WFV34rAQSOnVZAk9-6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120406222138.GB12641@uio.no>
	<1333811327.30705.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<CAA93jw57DXSVOtz_Z6b85iSu0a9q67LGhgpHX+YPPxo2oGQWHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no>
	<D6DCDC0C-0754-4CE8-8C54-C2A809DB51A7@gmail.com>
	<20120407181034.GD21452@uio.no>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Best practices for paced TCP on Linux?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:27:37 -0000


On 7 Apr, 2012, at 9:10 pm, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:

> Have you tried the one at cesur.tg12? It's pacing things out a bit =
more.

After reducing my TCP *receive* window to 64KB, the 720p50 stream at the =
main site is playing just fine - or at least it was, until the =
presenters just came on for the "Grand Finale".  That was a very abrupt =
and well-synchronised change in performance, so there has to be =
something different there.

I appreciate, however, that a 64KB window requires a maximum of 100ms =
round-trip latency at 5Mbps, so that's not a solution for New Zealond.

 - Jonathan=