From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
Received: from secmail.pch.net (secmail.pch.net [206.220.231.87])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBAC3B2A4
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 02:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from secmail.pch.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by secmail.pch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyRJW58Hlz4xl6h
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: secmail.pch.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass
 reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=pch.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pch.net; h=
 x-mailer:to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date
 :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=
 secmail_dkim; t=1681453515; x=1684045516; bh=Y3kx7TWRQbfgaIuXCj/
 SmkvbxEVaNx7TH8vVtesqb8s=; b=V7lIYa56uctaVPSK4hxsxY7PgtHcvGRniMM
 T6CxKVQzdPGLKaOE9DbgWAR6MzBgFK2veuVBzuvva81fTuxu0hWA1SS3NDqWvbJG
 BXPg8UiR/VFnXgr+fTnA03ebi0h7E3BTgXdLkXyFo7juh7pW+4LaUqnDkOi3hobG
 5QaS8Na8Bb1grJON5z31gNe9fyL1A01KVmARDx8P/JNvl3wea1HZa04aoEpOnvDO
 ZcSZrqWaroxXH4EQLK1dwXAjK65OghKSSmYCEPPVNvwWBA1J4BuiU4RDoFQ9LAfc
 Uzw1YF+Jcs+x02ieWeERJcgyerkuu3Z+symaP0yiJx9c4j/1/Hw==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secmail.pch.net
Received: from secmail.pch.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by secmail.pch.net (secmail.pch.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id 3B0JJrGC8k4R for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (itv-02 [69.166.14.6])
 by secmail.pch.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PyRJV19Qbz51hjZ;
 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <9232C347-0DAD-478E-AA98-9BFFEDCB5773@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:25:07 +0200
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Dave_T=C3=A4ht?= <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
 cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
 bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27D60D19-9C24-4E66-BE3D-A478C5BA05AA@pch.net>
References: <CAA93jw4-YMMw3WiU0QpPYT3c7SupnW2qWZHzSmRE1sK8hqpXgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9232C347-0DAD-478E-AA98-9BFFEDCB5773@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:12:33 -0400
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] can bus attack
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:25:16 -0000

> On Apr 14, 2023, at 8:08 AM, Sebastian Moeller via Cerowrt-devel =
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> there were a few years there where
>> fq_codel was the default for can, in openwrt, which sometimes keeps =
me
>> awake at night.
>=20
> [SM] How many critical CAN bus implementations actually use OpenWrt? I =
thought CAN is big in automobiles, so if any of those use OpenWrt that =
would be interesting news ;)

It=E2=80=99s also widely used in factory-floor and assembly-line =
automation.

                                -Bill=