From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9179B21F208 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B562018A for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:44:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: bloat In-Reply-To: References: <527213F5.6060406@kit.edu> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.5; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] DOCSIS 3.1 support for AQM X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:32:54 -0000 Has any one any analysis of having sfq_codel on the CPE (uplink) stream, and PIE on the CMTS (downlink) stream? I'm assuming that the two directions should not conflict, but given that RTT estimates and congestion signals involve bidirectional traffic, maybe this assumption is wrong. I also want to suggest that the fairness considerations of the household are not necessarily the same as the fairness considerations of the ISP. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [