From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E71D21F5DA for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j5so836097qga.3 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ejgkZQ7FV2z0fkJcYJ4gZcYhHHKbj9m9BI9YY5TvO4s=; b=XZj5wL3Rf9UWTjkL8lP/6gUAPTC35WEczIbahg3hheI2K440Xl0MxnFdT+oiXUZ8Nx +L/vdLzQq4X4veq2HJ6nTtpYM4vWUgTrWBqsxMAa96G/gxQaAKwJt4Y9DErGSCvUkwbh 2iSdJ3/p2YwEDdfYDU+9SXcfdAZ9azVCrzwCo59SmnEa/vIJ0reBqbrelCgj9CWEDfQX Yet0MH0I1gza1jN5T9bKkRqJNjcL1ifv+bazv1Yp4Mggnnfv2te1dpURejTr2kDvJnXA XvhxWvcGAyNtt1Di/yV3Ih0F/lgICn1MVxcwBhMSiwQvJCi1JpCFl16ZbX0B4W0qASBG ywXQ== X-Received: by 10.140.86.147 with SMTP id p19mr6892806qgd.66.1409236760966; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-5700.home.lan (pool-71-241-220-44.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.241.220.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a62sm5804382qga.21.2014.08.28.07.39.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E17B38D-E0C2-412B-9D2A-CD45F45CA49D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: <000901cfc2c2$c21ae460$4650ad20$@duckware.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:39:12 -0400 Message-Id: <2A5BB518-351B-4598-AF79-7088D640AA06@gmail.com> References: <000001cfbefe$69194c70$3b4be550$@duckware.com> <000901cfc2c2$c21ae460$4650ad20$@duckware.com> To: Jerry Jongerius X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:39:22 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_5E17B38D-E0C2-412B-9D2A-CD45F45CA49D Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38E6BE56-5817-409E-8314-D8A2C09C79A6" --Apple-Mail=_38E6BE56-5817-409E-8314-D8A2C09C79A6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Jerry, > AQM is a great solution for bufferbloat. End of story. But if you = want to track down which device in the network intentionally dropped a = packet (when many devices in the network path will be running AQM), how = are you going to do that? Or how do youpropose to do that? Yes, but... I want to understand why you are looking to know which = device dropped the packet. What would you do with the information? The great beauty of fq_codel is that it discards packets that have dwelt = too long in a queue by actually *measuring* how long they've been in the = queue.=20 If the drops happen in your local gateway/home router, then it's = interesting to you as the "operator" of that device. If the drops happen = elsewhere (perhaps some enlightened ISP has installed fq_codel, PIE, or = some other zoomy queue discipline) then they're doing the right thing as = well - they're managing their traffic as well as they can. But once the = data leaves your gateway router, you can't make any further predictions. The SQM/AQM efforts of CeroWrt/fq_codel are designed to give near = optimal performance of the *local* gateway, to make it adapt to the = remainder of the (black box) network. It might make sense to instrument = the CeroWrt/OpenWrt code to track the number of fq_codel drops to come = up with a sense of what's 'normal'. And if you need to know exactly = what's happening, then tcpdump/wireshark are your friends.=20 Maybe I'm missing the point of your note, but I'm not sure there's = anything you can do beyond your gateway. In the broader network, = operators are continually watching their traffic and drop rates, and = adjusting/reconfiguring their networks to adapt. But in general, it's = impossible for you to have any sway/influence on their operations, so = I'm not sure what you would do if you could know that the third router = in traceroute was dropping... Best regards, Rich --Apple-Mail=_38E6BE56-5817-409E-8314-D8A2C09C79A6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi = Jerry,

AQM is a great solution for = bufferbloat.  End of story.  But if you want to track down = which device in the network intentionally dropped a packet (when many = devices in the network path will be running AQM), how are you going to do that?  Or = how do youpropose= to do that?

Yes, but... I want to = understand why you are looking to know which device dropped the packet. = What would you do with the information?

The = great beauty of fq_codel is that it discards packets that have dwelt too = long in a queue by actually *measuring* how long they've been in the = queue. 

If the drops happen in your local = gateway/home router, then it's interesting to you as the "operator" of = that device. If the drops happen elsewhere (perhaps some enlightened ISP = has installed fq_codel, PIE, or some other zoomy queue discipline) then = they're doing the right thing as well - they're managing their traffic = as well as they can. But once the data leaves your gateway router, you = can't make any further predictions.

The SQM/AQM = efforts of CeroWrt/fq_codel are designed to give near optimal = performance of the *local* gateway, to make it adapt to the remainder of = the (black box) network. It might make sense to instrument the = CeroWrt/OpenWrt code to track the number of fq_codel drops to come up = with a sense of what's 'normal'. And if you need to know exactly what's = happening, then tcpdump/wireshark are your = friends. 

Maybe I'm missing the point = of your note, but I'm not sure there's anything you can do beyond your = gateway. In the broader network, operators are continually watching = their traffic and drop rates, and adjusting/reconfiguring their networks = to adapt. But in general, it's impossible for you to have any = sway/influence on their operations, so I'm not sure what you would do if = you could know that the third router in traceroute was = dropping...

Best = regards,

Rich
= --Apple-Mail=_38E6BE56-5817-409E-8314-D8A2C09C79A6-- --Apple-Mail=_5E17B38D-E0C2-412B-9D2A-CD45F45CA49D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT/z8UAAoJEH4agC/0z73/cZgH/i/+lt/jb+rnag2E1D6Br6gl /qBpP6MWb148BOOMoEOGoME2NPqL8wc9GSpX5sgYTURM8oHZS7smU85NN7kOU0s9 2TarOaCIbxNhWP3V7P4ssbAFnDa6G9JeBHYlkB5cSzAfQU1Nu8tikc+ZLf3F13Zu 7aye9LczlMWV3RXFoLkseiIjYzBpMt4LRMq//9R7xeXmayhF54ZuIXsk50T/bnKP zaH5jw3Flmx354r168dINY081qlhqFzuT1XjgjHv4wkXRoujclX6GP7C0LoNAOR5 Lj0g4M/M3PxVTkuVtH3NFc0VIUiD7FdUnLLKoBgu4dVPpw4YVth3aksefcHsmmU= =/6RI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_5E17B38D-E0C2-412B-9D2A-CD45F45CA49D--