From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "mx11.netapp.com",
	Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 International Server CA - G3" (not verified))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA7A21F1CB
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,881,1367996400"; 
	d="asc'?scan'208";a="41567591"
Received: from vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104])
	by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2013 18:25:15 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.240]) by
	vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104]) with mapi id
	14.03.0123.003; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:25:15 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] [iccrg] ECN support for PIE AQM in Linux
Thread-Index: AQHOmVBFFA6HspGimkyLiVr34NauMpmV700A
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:25:14 +0000
Message-ID: <2A9ED096-C647-4D7A-A32B-422F1DFC3ACA@netapp.com>
References: <CAEjQQ5XUHYOmbtUdV2Mi90X=NkKyFOREhV7xW=29jEV7Tn40UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGK4HS-8fomYCR3Sx6bpL3HO9Soc8MtFS73=y9Y=QwwPBOZkjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEjQQ5VXiKTAwCa8jxAdCMxGUcACx1yYomOB4_d6P-pp58vVnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7Omv-j7u-wHPwyuKN5y-htEr+G248_-4jbZRveOBzwMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7Omv-j7u-wHPwyuKN5y-htEr+G248_-4jbZRveOBzwMg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_ECB9A846-6B3D-4A1A-84B7-045EC3B9A868";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>,
	"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] [iccrg] ECN support for PIE AQM in Linux
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:25:17 -0000

--Apple-Mail=_ECB9A846-6B3D-4A1A-84B7-045EC3B9A868
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

On Aug 15, 2013, at 8:41, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, I only now - today! - just noticed that the new pie code at =
cisco's
> site seems *substantially* different from the older pie code the above =
was
> based on

I guess the lesson is that these code drops need version numbers, and we =
need to REPORT the versions whenever we present results.

Lars=20

--Apple-Mail=_ECB9A846-6B3D-4A1A-84B7-045EC3B9A868
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQCVAwUBUgwt+tZcnpRveo1xAQKN6AQAqJ81/pSeP//Wc7veJ+vCj0lR76Z2b1WG
0wLdPnp3WiwmB75ZLj6NRxsqVYvEd1X+WmLbmOBR+tT824Cpys5ZZvNjYxvO5nhq
PH/gYCKJwGmgRpPKj1WX0he7SKNxbNDAg2L/YX0/ShXyjBC0FN+1ray6QBsinCQK
rRDnI0PftBs=
=9YMu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_ECB9A846-6B3D-4A1A-84B7-045EC3B9A868--