From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F4B3CB35 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 17:14:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1572642889; bh=4shrJtsSJldjNVaBoQL8TdBsBAJxtzvTFJrZSO2i+QY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=PFRCHFfuGW82sAEI87sJRL67X3uW5XPzi2s2PxEK7LCNS78rpGd4uyHwR9hmvlexz 8e5epYnvAGCKUflW+NrMWak6vdWBywb5/xsroTcA/LmRakLXzvHTc6O8OkQBOyICHu ctfdp0DZ7C0bQqw7LJJqQxa04T+ufQI9mIsZhLBk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.42.222] ([77.10.176.12]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MuUnK-1i9X6x23Ji-00rb9u; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 22:14:49 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:14:48 +0100 Cc: bloat Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E9BF8C4-814A-4C15-A343-91D4809984DE@gmx.de> References: To: =?utf-8?Q?Dave_T=C3=A4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FNAiQaPXTgKDE3c4XUP6ZgYfjDZTXlpYdrgOuS+mDWEGG9tdXVd 8EtGZqc+q2FpxmoXBllHTFbqsGUbC6Am2lTdCA8o4eDu8Rd5MIcaSaZJ1CElI/Enk4ZOGQL gsqownxULghaY67JZhMxM6k7FRRzKEYDLfRr6+t1wgyZQVtQqS8Uu5jK2PmMrVXDNuZhSIg nhSeUWgZ/acgrVKb8rfdQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:zeeZoNBnLt8=:ZyiuAfLS9uJ3zDwLtxnWN6 HLfGPo33YVvP9Z+FWSIYJk0uc44APEuQR0kJfoYv/3dkKkMpje8M+XBDgJxNY3wM1saMwwEiD dXtaDUgz67SXZdDAGyT6HIYBeI4rIa6IggPgrHPnRtxwb2p7hQW4K/PAcqu7LPFmBe5WVVvLc IpxODsj30JChSL91b6uOP/228Yln17TowAjUpHnntVqUfci9VgjW/x8l9Qk0TNrRSU9juiap0 9hCx+5OAR7IgGWnMTA7UFqBpJxEHstPm2yQhXT4gbmks+6tT6mNMBcuYeevh0lSK3N9pyelpT 8ILVJO/o+hpJ2t/iAU8HTWuG4v5QwJgerRi4yriRqGuBGgASsBI80jeW+j0maVVkn1jf8wh5o 1qsxJQCtsXOg6RENa137zSsH+8xTdN4UFx2ruyEqG2Y6mqvC171yq2HZmUMozF6cKRD/FlabN PbCWHlAOS3ADL/mraHX7JHGUp+5rTrqc4HHJ2t6/b8TXoUI2MHA//XimT79qY1iS4Fhx5NikC yESqKXz/e9W5nitKelK0CYJoQVLoghhNMyZk+sywkh2cKRHukJeTzzXJCzI5QiKT0PL9c5Kpr rkePReiu12+sVrIhhV+2kuwV2OGQZEOOSK+EIhXGl9KTOP43pPlmCcIWPVO56bP9bs9RShabC hPVbdjK2aykfVdkU5Kvd+WQnrRkifEIptz2F9G0He721izwLrTDdAIw7pCQGJX0WrQc3rvI93 kSMpG8wwz5RB7UzB9ZyaQuydBdXIc9eEO5RuFk/teKQAYDr1UWSkrAVO4ReY6EBEd8AmQbYdO mcxcAQySAu8EOJTlbgWbSLGVAVnBiZI2VF4nCNhUUjP9JSkZiPQ44gjw2wLAW/R0Cl2x4GDN5 9h9dDDCXnw0Ry1m6DUDS7jtHI9TYh4bucJSStltg4OMHtIMdaFyq38UwwbWy31K/dOimk4fgA 7kOfP3jkRA+/D+n+EiUP1TS3D7p3syuIIZyPoRe+2n0px8iaJnu7mT8bDDJQt3KPU6roY9wel qPa9RymTz8CgTXmapYgM6BWovbbleDVYZE52KrHuJTKPy6A2XR2rdsTm2pWX/DsJXJ2sa/8tR IA0Jjw5sasg8vb4NbsnRkTpI2L5wk/yrU6d9XreH6FGLB0GCj1AjdCHzgp6XX4blZC8S23qHw n2IjYHt5AgeNHXlnr+0xsIp8VH9e6nIkdb7pXTbUVUG37yFZVnoMXf9bypWiOomdAf5P6sDfS Z415xeMu1dsxARK3UVO4Q6FrlHAvN77creT7yU+IpveVcwF8vW5ILKrw6Eh0= Subject: Re: [Bloat] bbr on slashdot X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:14:51 -0000 Hi Dave > On Nov 1, 2019, at 19:19, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > = https://tech.slashdot.org/story/19/10/31/204226/googles-network-congestion= -algorithm-isnt-fair-researchers-say Interestingly, the naive expectation in the vice text is equal sharing = between all concurrent flows, if only we had a system that could = actually help achieving this kind of set-up that is fair to each flow... Best Regards Sebastian > --=20 >=20 > Dave T=C3=A4ht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-205-9740 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat