From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CDF21F3C8 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk Sender: toke@toke.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1427494714; bh=dPf+GXi03HUQKk++qSGCKMENR0WBpOR5I7dRyUfN56g=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:CC; b=EzybZ0E0v/7ApsE+/w8qHL6TZa5Em25VTI3BncuoX4bAYb/YkAfTusDKGkVso8sdj vYxKOw0EtXJyKZ9q/Q3nigM556XspWdfEgeiiac23o7Xf1+acDkHUdIlGImIUeFo/X dfdtU4OMPRBGJYRgTqcDiDP5G4afEPShFQceBRyo= In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:18:30 +0100 To: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" ,David Lang X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <367FBE43-C3CF-4947-AD4C-521506F7C799@toke.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bloat] setting queue depth on tail drop configurations of pfifo_fast X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:19:12 -0000 >I would like to reduce the tail drop queue size to 100 packets (down >from the default of 1000) and see how that impacts the test. 3 seconds >of bloat is pretty bad, and I would like to compare how ABR works at at >1 second and at 200-300 ms. Did you re-initiate the pfifo_fast qdisc after changing txqlen? IIRC, it = picks up the len at init time, and so won't update automatically when you= change it... -Toke