From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A1E13B2A4 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:51:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id c20so1861116qkm.1 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:51:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=/Yy17NnSUmCWYIeEfLNSAYQ8gt4tWFUDH0VJTdVuCeo=; b=sPSov4q2FGcfffFIrefMjY+WeDxqU9LrfKfOq3I0dcVqlZA2WcoWwfAa5IX9Bqyz4w jBrRuOVZIJOpQxRE3j9PUyGm6NzSmut5td3BttA6Rq4n9bCEe2F9RGnI37GbwBwJEhbA AMpIcCu1evQ1qjG6H/LsANDJ99mYwwxXKNA0S6eJgDHlPq6JYK93USJLskggRLbgKYPS OtRzinUnOp4J3N9oCiOrposXWVq66nz+aXjYItvWfvCSSStIqH97wEl+b4+3qO3oeG0X yChg899pwVCKtloS4DrruCUKGJr1PYZgZeCsrakf2I1Z0Mtcg03LkymjnaRHS+O2abFX VhWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=/Yy17NnSUmCWYIeEfLNSAYQ8gt4tWFUDH0VJTdVuCeo=; b=oz670zZam3z5Rv90xXuDBwf48yFZf1XW3d4tWf3RryCNruGZRtdmq8uVSGkaQT1oQ+ 7BT3SsGqGt8FiaNPbnS7JT3dpAfPkxrod2w1eBN3gqmnPtOmDqmgCXXztuw5B0TcQ9Na r/UjxONMROKEslvk24yEHfAYvj4LsK+f4Ob7qOV7tCpCH5hbOK3zcec+CrKfvEMweldD 6WEK2MF+wHlsCAE5sFNZ/oNEjgZrs3S2IEmST5Dny9x37dchIjD7YaNrkIxukE/rwYMb 1gpax3SmgjjHLA72fopEcSQBnpjuQfqTQddvzmXz82qWUObHlwe6ZdMlT4geIV/XzMvH kP1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVj++OrwWU8bT2H7kUZiSVlB1S44CdXwBwEVulyWi3jST0LyaBB 7QQhI/kTGY8w8t9lRA7uF0db/6kRH6M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyksc59hMGxNYvCT+LKA4v9Tb/m4Z9wNDfIphAgM83BxeRMQEtCc/QgyysogM7ojfXEHGosZg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a389:: with SMTP id m131mr17955129qke.251.1582293102763; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-10337.lan ([64.223.173.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c26sm1538189qtn.19.2020.02.21.05.51.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:51:42 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Brown Message-Id: <36AC0E86-7889-4A76-A253-B43A85DBD4E0@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A1DCD92F-A52F-4473-987D-7BF43D2F456D" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:51:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tv3ktcds.fsf@toke.dk> Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net To: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= References: <146A9AC4-7EA6-4759-A4D1-D0613C6B650D@gmail.com> <87tv3ktcds.fsf@toke.dk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Subject: Re: [Bloat] macOS Catalina causes 'hugo serve' to segfault... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:51:43 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A1DCD92F-A52F-4473-987D-7BF43D2F456D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Feb 21, 2020, at 6:20 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = wrote: >=20 > Looking at that thread, I don't really get the feeling that they're = any > more helpful now :/ I can second that thought.=20 > As an alternative, maybe it'll be possible to build a new version of = the > 0.16 Hugo binary with a newer Go runtime? I very much doubt that the > segfault is because of the Hugo code itself... My thought exactly. In case anyone has a burning urge to get distracted = on this, I'll take a whack at this over the weekend. (After all, it's my = computer that's busted...) Rich= --Apple-Mail=_A1DCD92F-A52F-4473-987D-7BF43D2F456D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On Feb 21, 2020, at 6:20 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = <toke@toke.dk> = wrote:

Looking at that thread, I don't = really get the feeling that they're any
more helpful now :/

I can second that thought. 

As an alternative, maybe it'll = be possible to build a new version of the
0.16 Hugo binary with a newer Go runtime? I very much doubt = that the
segfault is = because of the Hugo code itself...

My thought exactly. In case anyone has a = burning urge to get distracted on this, I'll take a whack at this over = the weekend. (After all, it's my computer that's busted...)

Rich
= --Apple-Mail=_A1DCD92F-A52F-4473-987D-7BF43D2F456D--