From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81813B29D for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 10:23:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id o10so11834707qtr.6 for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 07:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=3jOD+Xvw/lvPjuGIvnnQPOcbwxvBDD/10zs6YnkSWag=; b=pzQobXq0j3Qh3Li2Ym86MD2vuXgpY4llFFmTtNswnsFSNtAzUH/hjeaOp76+QhmIFt MLY0fnS4Jg/C4PvgeNDwIeKfMd9UW5qXsQVzwHochJU2pZj7xcLtxEK2o49Oyrgo9Whe 9EGY2JAF/ysdYbUVRTes/gHJ3dulWA13c6xuEHSd/WTU0yyh53lc+MG6GiKQPfGqLws7 FRmV08E2wUQoFkx8zgqPgiWHha8texollk4i+jL9H3fEwCrpwiOSCpw9TXkdREWCjKLF vvsmiDbNMd/0yZn3m9pY1JCEPjcqtYWX9ArsVzLzWfQykK/e6gKmOCMqFNX8+hZhavkq STnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=3jOD+Xvw/lvPjuGIvnnQPOcbwxvBDD/10zs6YnkSWag=; b=KlXyPfszZKge5QJGL9WnLZO3bAcuJTgNJ0T2oNo/IM3sGNbuy0Wzr8TTunQ/mjnpnC IlSEJwY8jQ2OfuTGQMZPV0D1p7KteM2NP3kKsgmU5KN+wD1hjDGpkYUyULDn1uG5axWa hplSI2MWvGlz0oylqbtogn5LgEAQxa/fvKA8jiafG9oABaK0PutDH7ymT2FLAoCdGkzy Ja3hPM01Arc4RHglNyXkfFrCCJll6x3SROkVoeYI0xa8laY5UqhtpZ/ymy/uzj1Jbpye myZoLeL4YmHuOTFupxGfxaQBbQsoSVM/KWv1dJIs5r8dsjaRwAWpQJHGr07WqFiPCgHq E+AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZKGE/V6reAGMdSyE3sgQrdZMfM1ieLXmqZaXjawIhlQAXm1hHp LKv8rcaR6MfyjbjOMfYxiWPlhaW3OsI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKME8ROCP1xVaGRG1zdg2u8DexwJ7QgCnTwx7o3ZiWF0SQ7zPjbCrWKGNh6vMLL3Db+s9Yasw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:70c:: with SMTP id g12mr12345403qth.71.1588515791353; Sun, 03 May 2020 07:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-10337.lan ([70.16.109.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm8230616qtc.52.2020.05.03.07.23.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 May 2020 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Message-Id: <3764C024-5F18-41C8-98F0-9FA423ED5860@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 10:23:10 -0400 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Subject: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 14:23:12 -0000 Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), = I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from = our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router. I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.=20 But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control = (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to = expect.=20 Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks. Rich=