General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: John D <j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] SQM tuning question
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 18:44:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39DED14A-AACF-4C45-9834-C295F92E8800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKWkaxE-TzwopqC6xopCv5OCG=DLqf==FjcFQvYUHQhi5o-=7g@mail.gmail.com>

> On 3 Jun, 2023, at 4:56 pm, John D via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> On the website it says the following:
> 
> CoDel is a novel “no knobs”, “just works”, “handles variable bandwidth and RTT”, and simple AQM algorithm.
> 
> 	• It is parameterless — no knobs are required for operators, users, or implementers to adjust.
> 	• It treats good queue and bad queue differently - that is, it keeps the delays low while permitting bursts of traffic.
> 	• It controls delay, while insensitive to round-trip delays, link rates, and traffic loads.
> 	• It adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization.
> 
> But everywhere I have read about about hardware which implements SQM (including the bufferbloat website) it describes the need to tune based on actual internet connection speed.
> These seem to conflict especially that "handles variable bandwidth" bit. Have I misunderstood or do the algorithms used in modern hardware just not provide this part typically? My connection performance is quite variable and I'm worried about crippling SQM to the lowest speed seen.

SQM in practice requires three components:

1: Flow isolation, so that different flows don't affect each others' latency and are delivered fairly;

2: Active Queue Management (AQM) to signal flows to slow down transmissions when link capacity is exceeded;

3: Bandwidth shaping to match the queue to the available capacity.

CoDel is, in itself, only the AQM component.  It does indeed work pretty well with no additional tuning - but only in combination with the other two components, or when applied directly to the actual bottleneck.  Unfortunately in most consumer internet links, the actual bottleneck is inaccessible for this purpose.  Thus an artificial bottleneck must be introduced, at which SQM is applied.

The most convenient tool for applying all three SQM components at once is Cake.  This includes implementations of advanced flow isolation, CoDel AQM, and a deficit-mode bandwidth shaper.  All you really need to do is to tell it how much bandwidth you have in each direction, minus a small margin to ensure it becomes the actual bottleneck and can exert the necessary control.

When your available bandwidth varies over time, that can be inconvenient.  There are methods, however, of observing how available capacity tends to change over time (typically on diurnal and weekly patterns, if the variations are due to congestion in the ISP backhaul or peering) and scheduling adjustments on that basis.  If you have more information on your situation, we might be able to give more detailed advice.

 - Jonathan Morton

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-03 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-03 13:56 John D
2023-06-03 15:44 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2023-06-03 16:54   ` Kenneth Porter
2023-06-04 18:48     ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-06-03 17:17   ` John D
2023-06-03 18:04     ` Aaron Wood
2023-06-04 19:55       ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-06-04 18:56     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39DED14A-AACF-4C45-9834-C295F92E8800@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox