From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F1B21F207;
	Thu, 21 May 2015 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so102371355laa.1;
	Thu, 21 May 2015 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=7q5UtrZJnlDA020hob4hNbIa21B53MCohIg5b5nfRjQ=;
	b=Y5+07N9ndcreQu+ViuoL+UlvqvJDcdwWBx2XUMSlsOz/vAEHjschkj+1Kzy7FH0jkf
	p0G9gXxH0Py4mmlHxapQeEttJf94UoWoCPOLXZrCXGmzNBPb3N4VuluPF1mKV8a1lqsC
	XJ6LssI+qclENCo31qq3PL1o+qsetVM94AMnM1ub91DPKcF1+j3IWVA7EeUd+RmgbVYq
	S7KX5qd+TRRjMhLHPmCaFaBYRj/iB+jMKheGRUxDzU+CvXJ1jNJ1zb+DOTsI8Ym1mxuF
	1ntZKQ7J4fDC9ZSMZMOgwaPnyj9dDB2VEX1hnZJnVAIGHNftr1eQXsdTfmbMyxw4LSO3
	xVmQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.168.102 with SMTP id zv6mr2195005lbb.45.1432214545036;
	Thu, 21 May 2015 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.239.204] (87-95-2-222.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.95.2.222])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xg8sm5206302lac.17.2015.05.21.06.22.14
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 21 May 2015 06:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7GO6kw8YPXihFey6SJT_xeAiiZUOj767EM6+R4eoidjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:55 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3BDE8792-3B33-4DD6-B662-C18B2CECD183@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7GO6kw8YPXihFey6SJT_xeAiiZUOj767EM6+R4eoidjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Justin Beech <justinbeech@gmail.com>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cake] dslreports and inbound rate shaping
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:23:07 -0000


> On 19 May, 2015, at 22:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> So I finished writing up my thoughts on bobbie,
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Bobbie
>=20
> which might work better than anything on the table in the face of huge
> bursts like these, when the rate differential is so small.

I wonder if there=E2=80=99s any profit in making fq_codel and cake =
behave more like a policer on ingress; that would be halfway to bobbie =
without writing a lot of new code.

A reasonable test would be to try configuring fq_codel with interval =3D =
target =3D 5ms.  If that works better, I could add similar functionality =
to cake.

- Jonathan Morton