General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4191.1357761907@sandelman.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107233732.GE3635@nuttenaction>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2023 bytes --]


(not having read the thread yet on purpose)

Reading the paper, my initial thought was: big queues can only happen
where there is a bottleneck, and on the 1Gb/s CCZ links, that's unlikely
to be the case.  Then I understood that he is measuring there because
(he can and) really he is measuring the delay to other peers, from a
place that can easily fill the various network queues.

I don't understand the analysis of RTT increases/decreases.

It seems to me, that for a given host pair, there is some RTT
theorectical minimum, which represents a completely empty network, and
perhaps one can observe something close to it in the samples, and maybe
a periodic ICMP ping would have been in order, particularly when the
host pair was not observed to have any traffic flowing.  

The question of queuing delay then can be answered by how much higher
the RTT is over some minimum.  (And only then, does one begin to ask
questions about GeoIP and speed of photons and speed of modulated
electron wavefronts).  
Maybe that's the point of the RTT increase/decrease discussion in
section 2.2

This paper seems to really be about increasing IW.
The conclusion that 7-20% of connections would even benefit from an
increase in IW, and that long lived connections would open their window
anyway, for me, removes the question of bufferbloat from the IW debate.

The conclusion that bloat is <100ms for 50% of samples, and <250ms
for 94% of samples is useful: as the network architect for an commercial
enterprise focused VoIP provider, those numbers are terrifying.  I think
the situation is worse, but even if it's as good as reported, we can not
afford an additional 250ms delay in the circuits :-) 

now, to read the thread.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
	










[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 307 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-09 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-07 23:37 Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-01-08  0:33 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-08  0:40   ` David Lang
2013-01-08  2:04   ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08  2:24     ` David Lang
2013-01-09 20:08       ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-08  4:52     ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08  1:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-01-08  2:15   ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-01-08 12:44   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-01-08 13:55     ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09  0:03       ` David Lang
2013-01-10 13:01         ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 20:14       ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-09 20:19         ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 20:31           ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-10 18:05             ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 14:04     ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 17:22   ` Dave Taht
2013-01-09 20:05 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2013-01-09 20:14   ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08  7:35 [Bloat] bufferbloat paper Ingemar Johansson S
2013-01-18 22:00 ` Haiqing Jiang
2013-01-08 19:03 Hal Murray
2013-01-08 20:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09  0:12 ` David Lang
2013-01-09  1:59   ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09  4:53     ` David Lang
2013-01-09  5:13       ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09  5:32       ` Mark Allman
     [not found] <87r4lvgss4.fsf@toke.dk>
2013-01-09  3:39 ` [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper Mark Allman
2013-01-09  5:02   ` David Lang
2013-01-18  1:23     ` grenville armitage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4191.1357761907@sandelman.ca \
    --to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox