From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Packet loss in FCC press release
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:49:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435DDB48-33B9-400A-ACE3-CD29C50CF6E3@netapp.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 869 bytes --]
Hi,
did anyone notice the second sentence in paragraph below from the FCC's press release at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0226/DOC-332260A1.pdf:
> In addition to the existing transparency rule, which was not struck down by the court, the Order requires that broadband providers disclose, in a consistent format, promotional rates, fees and surcharges and data caps. Disclosures must also include packet loss as a measure of network performance, and provide notice of network management practices that can affect service.
"Packet loss as a measure of network performance" being the only such measure explicitly called out doesn't leave me with the warm fuzzy feeling that the folks the factors affecting QoE over IP networks. ISPs are being incentivized to optimize for reduced packet loss, and we know how that goes.
Lars
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 10:49 Eggert, Lars [this message]
2015-02-27 15:47 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-27 16:35 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-27 19:47 ` Matt Mathis
2015-02-27 19:08 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435DDB48-33B9-400A-ACE3-CD29C50CF6E3@netapp.com \
--to=lars@netapp.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox