From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (mxout-202-iad.mailhop.org [216.146.32.202]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DF32E0EA3 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:35:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scan-11-iad.mailhop.org (scan-11-iad.local [10.150.0.208]) by mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BE444AD8C for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:35:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 213.165.64.22 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 539B244AD4B for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2011 10:35:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO srichardlxp2) [213.143.107.142] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 13 Feb 2011 11:35:54 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20720068 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18f2+UO8cofp2078MEB6nIg9kezLDmqNs98AG+nX4 KB21nUnobUfi6k Message-ID: <448E536DC6A54DF19F13A42281655A2E@srichardlxp2> From: "Richard Scheffenegger" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dave_=22T=E4ht=22?= , "bloat" References: <878vxksdpk.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:29:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Steven Bellovin Subject: Re: [Bloat] Re-ECN X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:35:59 -0000 Right now, focus is on IPv6 - IPv4 may follow is the IETF find the benefits valuable enough to spend the last bit on this scheme.. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/conex/charter/ and http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/current/maillist.html Regards, Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave "Täht"" To: "bloat" Cc: "Steven Bellovin" Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 6:31 AM Subject: [Bloat] Re-ECN > > JG's blog comments contain a wealth of information as yet unexplored and > quantified. I ran across mention of re-ECN[1], which seems to have some > potential. > > In particular, I liked the full backward compatibility with RFC3514[2]. > > Is the "is it safe to use ECN" research going on exploring what happens > when the last unused bit in the TCP header is also set? > > -- > Dave Taht > http://nex-6.taht.net > > 1: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-re-ecn-tcp-09 > 2: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3514 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat