From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass header.d=lackof.org header.i=@lackof.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2023 header.b=CKQE5+D8; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=lackof.org policy.dmarc=none Received: from full.lackof.org (full.lackof.org [204.13.164.203]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B096913EA41D for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.230] (c-73-59-126-132.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.59.126.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by full.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4h9JPT2Zn8zyNq for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:55:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lackof.org; s=2023; t=1785344157; bh=Ey8qdhwX6WbnMGyJ2yo5tJMtt05EAeUBUa3pAvB5azM=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=CKQE5+D8cSfQEVL04le30+muBICrF40FU0S38fweDFRXD8+wERhft0EMgA4jGrdV2 mVeTwvjZwSyiggqLbSYmZzfCcBqzSfAq3/04boAaKNLSXTgpxs5B0p3PHnrxE3xZ5d AvtZ77jg3lRflPn1+j7hSd+VE6DdRVUXnuh9xah+V/peL/HS6BvixeDpn3a8NpFUFm eqkZ6GYkebu6KmgLup6uM85NmdPaYp23mKygPu0pjRoxdjV9rLEDsmzAj1Q+ritooA E6r6sq+OZ/kMXweKHhXmqICNH1gnEIvIBotpfKmP2FOzPFN4k3oKWSfI06Sm5zYPgj C9TwgqT9A1/DA== Message-ID: <462c2fb2-eaa8-48b5-bc72-6113b5e5cf10@lackof.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:54:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <178513222851.1604.3077360125516323841@gauss> <9CB6FF5C-601F-43B4-963F-CD2B4098ED12@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Matt Taggart In-Reply-To: <9CB6FF5C-601F-43B4-963F-CD2B4098ED12@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID-Hash: TUEQNFGWQN3UOS2B4257NT22FUIUS3JK X-Message-ID-Hash: TUEQNFGWQN3UOS2B4257NT22FUIUS3JK X-MailFrom: matt@lackof.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Subject: [Bloat] Re: LibreQoS CLI - in OpenWrt? List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 7/29/26 9:30 AM, Rich Brown wrote: > >> On Jul 27, 2026, at 02:03, bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net wrote: >> >> It was asked for by QoO guys for their IETF 126 Vienna Hackathon, but it >> will be useful for everyone, so it was added to the speedtest website now: >> >> https://test.libreqos.com/cli/ The direct URL the installer uses for linux/x86_64 is https://download.libreqos.com/cli/latest/libreqos-test-linux-x86_64 it's a dynamically linked executable that only uses base system libraries, no additional dependencies. How is it licensed and is the source somewhere? I did find this https://github.com/LibreQoE/LibreQoS It's not clear if the cli stuff is in there yet. I look forward to this being packages in distros so I can install it everywhere! > This is cool, indeed. I wonder if it would be a suitable replacement for my `betterspeedtest.sh` script in OpenWrtScript (https://github.com/richb-hanover/OpenWrtScripts#betterspeedtestsh). I love betterspeedtest.sh and appreciate it existing and will continue to use it even if there are alternatives. But I know a big part of making it available is actually making the backend servers it uses for testing available. I guess this new libreqos cli tool uses the same infra as their web based tester, is that documented somewhere? Matt