Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?

[Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>]

> On 20. mar. 2015, at 17.31, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 20 Mar, 2015, at 16:54, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> 
>> I'd like people to understand that packet loss often also comes with delay - for having to retransmit.
> 
> Or, turning it upside down, it’s always a win to drop packets (in the service of signalling congestion) if the induced delay exceeds the inherent RTT.

Actually, no: as I said, the delay caused by a dropped packet can be more than 1 RTT - even much more under some circumstances. Consider this quote from the intro of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukkipati-tcpm-tcp-loss-probe-01  :

***
To get a sense of just how long the RTOs are in relation to
   connection RTTs, following is the distribution of RTO/RTT values on
   Google Web servers. [percentile, RTO/RTT]: [50th percentile, 4.3];
   [75th percentile, 11.3]; [90th percentile, 28.9]; [95th percentile,
   53.9]; [99th percentile, 214].
***

That would be for the unfortunate case where you drop a packet at the end of a burst and you don't have TLP or anything, and only an RTO helps...

Cheers,
Michael