From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-157-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.157]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93162E00FC for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:24:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from scan-31-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-31-ewr.local [10.0.141.237]) by mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC1B6F7958 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:24:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 76.96.30.32 Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3F06F723B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 20JP1g0061GXsucA30QTpa; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:24:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.119] ([98.229.99.32]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 20QQ1g00x0hvpMe8U0QSJo; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:24:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4D460137.3070305@freedesktop.org> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:24:23 -0500 From: Jim Gettys Organization: Bell Labs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <208F592F3F104C89AA0135E5F02B2241@srichardlxp2> In-Reply-To: <208F592F3F104C89AA0135E5F02B2241@srichardlxp2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] ECN & AQM Hall of Fame? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:24:36 -0000 On 01/30/2011 05:40 PM, Richard Scheffenegger wrote: > Hi, > > wasn't there talk about getting a Hall of Fame for networks / operators, which are using and actively supporting AQM and ECN in their administrative domain? > > I just looked at some traces to troubleshoot SMTP with GMX (german freemail/hosting provider), and noticed that they are in fact negotiating for ECN on their mail servers: > > 0.885436 IP home.58492> mx0.gmx.net.smtp: SWE 1849574907:1849574907(0) win 5840 > 0.885581 IP mx0.gmx.net.smtp> home.58492: SE 2571500293:2571500293(0) ack 1849574908 win 5792 > > ;) > You just talked: so why not start one? That's what wiki's are for... Best Regards, - Jim