From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-11-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-033-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.33]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF802E04A9 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-11-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-11-ewr.local [10.0.141.229]) by mail-11-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6921592E384 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:00:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 209.85.215.43 Received: from mail-ew0-f43.google.com (mail-ew0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by mail-11-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC73D92E373 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so3032017ewy.16 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L5MqcYve31Gabvo7hjc6n+GeEGqP1WOUCBUb2dRB1rA=; b=lc7s31SVS2yTQlmbBjeq8vMzwbMMOHe7dk0XNY1z0NeUs0Syp0QbwW4S5jQ7WuUnX+ XoLnmCO+IQor6hZt8XzcEHROJczTSgfaSJnlmmR10M72RgleSjd7xpkXlRfscI7sOEV6 WAz9SYWKI1AKVjoyUEo4fh4kLddke06uc5OfM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gTxGuen1A01rXosWlfJfrcUd+58qq8qjDXotZ+hIFjo2LWegRMR17pIrCILWBb55y4 BnjFxSKNlkkxI4SJ67TtB8GKk76nrNZp15BYTIFbNxF5LwHJmM/N8uieMI4ZqHJeABVm 7IzUquQs5a3UOo+sZ8NW2GGAKDgA1IxVg6jJQ= Received: by 10.213.104.20 with SMTP id m20mr868112ebo.21.1300968001156; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.12.0.162] ([195.207.5.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v1sm4446437eeh.27.2011.03.24.04.59.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jim Gettys Message-ID: <4D8B3239.1070703@freedesktop.org> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:59:53 +0100 From: Jim Gettys Organization: Bell Labs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <7imxklz5vu.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <7imxklz5vu.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] Thoughts on Stochastic Fair Blue X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:00:03 -0000 On 03/24/2011 02:03 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Methinks that it would be worthwile to implement plain BLUE, in order to > see how it compares. (Of course, once Jim comes down from Mount Sinai > and hands us RED-Lite, it might also be worth thinking about SFRed.) > Heh. I'll try, but being Moses is really tough, given god's previous track record... For god's sake, don't wait for god... And keep in mind that god has been wrong in the past. We need do breadth first search through the solution space. - Jim