General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation
@ 2011-04-12 17:44 Bruce Atherton
  2011-04-13  5:24 ` Fred Baker
  2011-04-13 10:42 ` Bob Briscoe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Atherton @ 2011-04-12 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

For those that are interested, I've written a simplified explanation of 
BufferBloat for a nontechnical audience using a classic "I Love Lucy" 
episode as an analogy. I wrote it to introduce the concept to the people 
fighting Usage Based Billing here in Canada during a federal election.

I don't need to get all the details right because this is intended for 
the general population, but any feedback about the general correctness 
of the description is appreciated.

http://callenish.blogspot.com/2011/03/usage-based-billing-caused-by-internet.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation
  2011-04-12 17:44 [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation Bruce Atherton
@ 2011-04-13  5:24 ` Fred Baker
  2011-04-13 12:14   ` Dave Taht
  2011-04-13 10:42 ` Bob Briscoe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fred Baker @ 2011-04-13  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Atherton; +Cc: bloat

I think it's a fair description for the general public.

On Apr 12, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote:

> For those that are interested, I've written a simplified explanation of BufferBloat for a nontechnical audience using a classic "I Love Lucy" episode as an analogy. I wrote it to introduce the concept to the people fighting Usage Based Billing here in Canada during a federal election.
> 
> I don't need to get all the details right because this is intended for the general population, but any feedback about the general correctness of the description is appreciated.
> 
> http://callenish.blogspot.com/2011/03/usage-based-billing-caused-by-internet.html
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation
  2011-04-12 17:44 [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation Bruce Atherton
  2011-04-13  5:24 ` Fred Baker
@ 2011-04-13 10:42 ` Bob Briscoe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bob Briscoe @ 2011-04-13 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Atherton; +Cc: bloat

Bruce,

The candy factory analogy is a useful one. Thanks

However, I wouldn't associate it with the usage-billing issue or with 
NN. I know that was your original motivation for writing this, but 
the two issues (bandwith and latency) need to be treated separately.

Just because buffer bloat is slowing the little transfers (individual 
candies), doesn't mean anything about how much bandwidth is needed to 
transfer predicted volumes of data in reasonable time. That's about 
how many Ethels are employed to meet total demand for wrapping 
candies, which could still be an issue (or not) irrespective of 
whether we take away the hats and buckets.

The association with NN & usage-billing merely serves to confuse what 
is an otherwise helpful explanation.


Bob

At 18:44 12/04/2011, Bruce Atherton wrote:
>For those that are interested, I've written a simplified explanation 
>of BufferBloat for a nontechnical audience using a classic "I Love 
>Lucy" episode as an analogy. I wrote it to introduce the concept to 
>the people fighting Usage Based Billing here in Canada during a 
>federal election.
>
>I don't need to get all the details right because this is intended 
>for the general population, but any feedback about the general 
>correctness of the description is appreciated.
>
>http://callenish.blogspot.com/2011/03/usage-based-billing-caused-by-internet.html
>_______________________________________________
>Bloat mailing list
>Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation
  2011-04-13  5:24 ` Fred Baker
@ 2011-04-13 12:14   ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2011-04-13 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

You may have created an earworm.

Everytime I encountered a bug when trying to work with the web interface 
on the bismark project yesterday, I kept crying out in Desi Arnaz's voice...

"LUCIIIIII!"

http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/80


On 04/12/2011 11:24 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> I think it's a fair description for the general public.
>
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
>
>> For those that are interested, I've written a simplified explanation of BufferBloat for a nontechnical audience using a classic "I Love Lucy" episode as an analogy. I wrote it to introduce the concept to the people fighting Usage Based Billing here in Canada during a federal election.
>>
>> I don't need to get all the details right because this is intended for the general population, but any feedback about the general correctness of the description is appreciated.
>>
>> http://callenish.blogspot.com/2011/03/usage-based-billing-caused-by-internet.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-13 12:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-12 17:44 [Bloat] Simplified Bloat explanation Bruce Atherton
2011-04-13  5:24 ` Fred Baker
2011-04-13 12:14   ` Dave Taht
2011-04-13 10:42 ` Bob Briscoe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox