On 05/29/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek > > wrote: > > > And the irony is that the lower speed is specifically chosen for > > multicast in order to make sure all clients in range can hear them > > reliably. > > It was my understanding that it was done for compatibility with older > devices, since 2 Mbit/s is the fastest rate supported by pre-B > spread-spectrum hardware. > > > And thus, everybody loses. I doubt there is much 802.11b gear still > active in the field. I think Juliusz is referring to old stuff pre-B, like the Digital RoamAbout. Certainly that is long gone, and I think pretty much all b hardware is gone, though having a "screw your performance to make something antique run" option someplace might become necessary for someone. - Jim