From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9023B29D for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 06:27:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1607513265; bh=pVOX49eYbJcdn/voKG1GJG1pbvV+5JGm9jOizGCaIj8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Tt0R9OGh8HRbGzgewEIHYZitplzglRb6zXQ4odZMHonO6z+FglROnJ0N5ytuaa35/ /d6KNyLrm1voGZKDHly+hzSyXSrLMsO33u7LrL2J27Gsn2YvZc5/Idi7RRmAKrzEuG s7ElIJXAN5UFm2SA3q+B8fniPJfH2P5QQvzlWmaY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.250.102] ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MvsIv-1jy1F13dPr-00svew; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:27:44 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <871rfzp6na.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:27:44 +0100 Cc: Kenneth Porter , Bufferbloat Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4E613653-EF22-40A2-B194-7BA543F15DE3@gmx.de> References: <8E303BEF17675E3847CBD76C@[172.27.17.193]> <877dprp7z3.fsf@toke.dk> <472E7038-DC03-4A54-97BC-49999B78B343@gmx.de> <871rfzp6na.fsf@toke.dk> To: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ufAcw8o1QQimAe+q7rFzKNCYjl/HuZCCFuJjjm3+eHP8NSyjWrY UxUg7vpSaF9eBb8J4zYnYt1Lt982I5zv4IBwnA91eMZQ4fL8FVqlS/cBAW4xntFrBBXJB6O D4TxLQB+7K9MTojTDgQlsQLsGBanA69JL7qy4AgiM7yh7vGPSx8PVugUALAX8P5UXjJS7vJ /xwS5QC15EfIjDobtq9wA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:84WjVywhqdE=:cOr2QafgUrL1TRWuAKiCeu OlPEs+dmODHy8HtCucWmopt6n36tg9yNggt+eL0T/KLb+uckszfBOiAiZm4FBnBCJW7lDoIFW B9rJMoam5QRNvpetxxsZunX+WikuypSQsoXCA4lm+a/ZqHzPiNlwPPKwxV0l4euhtgK/PGpDC Hpqh3gvZtlaXxss2hb1Fnr2QhtEmz5EAp2zlcc2EqhyZLzEGx5KbS1bsrozd+GgtdnufF4zO0 jrOz6sVNo91bWhDKF12ULxqmFywdLSe8nf6Rc238B+TEsIz6QrJhvH3t3hOkDobjOxYNibmY2 frwFtoghV1FrrAUQQyPq/Z14kmpHybyvFTRtZPNVKMJd6xksWHHHmwoEbUAvDZA04Yk1OA5wY SNjzjZ+C1BAEcwAQkQJTNoNlnG7duJe7avKrMp8NUbhantUlLzgMs1ksZ3q+YKbvjdGaucZXB kY2Wgl5PRKaODn4XOyvK4Ahfuhd9e6IUXdDg+3gILTv/WZTQC4+hSh20RCXGKL7/epLDxMj56 /h2kuVGpRbEYCsccTWhXKoMQlPeASeJpQR/0Is/F7+s6xLJMCS//IAt+06my3Ta0cpEBSeVU8 G3DgwfWHZspoTDy51am4OTraUJmArCbIku8emDcAQaN99FGywJWm7iSWeGcXEVk7XOKy6ixLr /1DIEgURybJvJDuL9To6gAHp4cxOIwH04s3RtTjK+CllOx2F/MD5/Q/ehZfvxvAk4d3JU+6// +sjANWSc8LtQoRq3/7QGeK8rjU3rVLL9mgnKuoedhTlV7bXRGzoI/Q8U2EhbezjM/QUd7BWgP LZSgvq1Rx3SMMzh6B5lnOUblfPUKuVTQORMpJhjD3wC19krTqZ/mllBU/pv+JbG1lz1h27Zk9 uC8/Ed5OFTjGhV5pO5DA9nPQHpaUjXl+zGOqDhLLx7J0uZ7JOUTV6WgR3XqK/3 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Why you need at least 3Mbps upload to get good game performance with ~1500byte packets: Doing the math X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 11:27:53 -0000 Hi Toke, > On Dec 9, 2020, at 12:20, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = wrote: >=20 > Sebastian Moeller writes: >=20 >> Hi Toke, >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:52, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen via Bloat = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Kenneth Porter writes: >>>=20 >>>> = >>>>=20 >>>> Upstream article: >>>>=20 >>>> = >>>=20 >>> Good points, but doesn't mention options to decrease the packet size >>> (lower MTU/MSS clamping)... :) >>=20 >> But he is doing exactly that in the script he developed for = OpenWrt games on poor links: >=20 > Ah, cool! May be necessary to actually decrease the interface MTU as > well, though, since TCP MSS clamping won't work for QUIC... Mmmh, QUIC does pMPUd, no? IN that case a "simple" filter to = drop QUIC packets along a certain size might already do the trick? >=20 > And of course, for IPv6 you can't decrease the MTU below 1280 bytes > without breaking spec :( Jepp, but MSS clamping still works, except there are limits how = low OS will go, Macos will not go below ~200, and I believe Linux also = recently got increased values for min MSS to counter some DOS issues = with SACK and friends, no? That said, it is well possible that even IPv6 = might work with smaller MTUs... Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > -Toke