From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com (mail-vw0-f43.google.com [209.85.212.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10FE201A87 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so4837976vws.16 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:27:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1pj7KnHU3SB6zSKdoeG5H92ZVbqw7xKb3qoWmkWsCT4=; b=UzmnkG78aJiJuiLq8/2ZaPZhfA+Naaypyv64lJIJ24F5dCrMmvJOVay1zU6Gmzpo0u WkehRk3e2AOQTyH2Y6PbWh81auoXN6feDMPFQQY/mMeDrQPdV/IxkVRDc33Besjwo172 ZGDrHsL9HoXuXI0Hll2vc3tG+YpzqfBxYVe08= Received: by 10.52.95.164 with SMTP id dl4mr17639385vdb.72.1320978426180; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:27:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (pool-74-105-153-80.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net. [74.105.153.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7sm15021109vdh.9.2011.11.10.18.27.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:27:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jim Gettys Message-ID: <4EBC87F7.4010602@freedesktop.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:27:03 -0500 From: Jim Gettys Organization: Bell Labs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] DHCP-PD and cerowrt X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:27:07 -0000 On 11/10/2011 07:17 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > Dear Maxim: > >> Updated to smoketest10. >> Those features are slightly tested now. After installing the necessary >> packages, 3g and pppoe work, dhcp6c also seems to be OK, but requires some >> messing with the /etc/config/dhcp6c.conf file. > What sorts of 'messing about' were required? (please send conf file) > > How big a PD (/64? /60? /56? what?) do they delegate? > > With comcast starting to go live with their dual stack trial, they > only will be delegating a /64 at first, > > http://blog.comcast.com/2011/11/ipv6-deployment-technology.html > > which blows up the routing-only concept in cerowrt when used with > classic autonegotiated /64 ipv6 addressing. However I'd planned for > that, in having AHCP available and babel be the default routing > protocols. AHCP distributes /128s across all interfaces, and in > combination with babel, lets you move transparently from wired to > wireless domains and back again, which is very liberating and an > advancement on the state of the art in home networking. > > so having hooks to AHCP and babel in there as alternative means to > distribute /128s across all the routed interfaces would be exciting. > If I knew what they were. > > Regardless of this particular hook, I'd like to make dhcpv6-pd > enablement part of the next release, by default, rather than as an > optional package. > Note that Comcast (and TWC, as far as I can tell) do plan to delegate larger prefixes. The existing IPv6 home routers only support a single /64 today. So this means they can start this phase of the dual stack service without having to deploy pd; but I think they are already testing pd internally. - Jim